最後,研究人員發現,吃全蛋組與只吃蛋白組相比,吃全蛋所引起的蛋白質纖維修復和恢復都有著顯著增加。伊利諾伊大學香檳分校(University of Illinois - Urbana - Champaign)的運動生理學家Nicholas A. Burd博士解釋,研究人員雖然無法100%正確的判定,吃進整顆雞蛋究竟為何會造成肌肉在修復與恢復上的大量反應,但這可能與Food synergy(食物協同作用)與食物成分理論,所引發的蛋白質合成理論相關,這將會比飲食中單單只攝取蛋白質這項成份要好的多。
【知識】關於吃蛋這件事,你是不要也都錯了!
#蛋白質
#增肌飲食
#肌肉成長
「university of illinois--urbana-champaign」的推薦目錄:
- 關於university of illinois--urbana-champaign 在 Luffy Move Your Body Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於university of illinois--urbana-champaign 在 美國在台協會 AIT Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於university of illinois--urbana-champaign 在 Sam Tsang 曾思瀚 Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於university of illinois--urbana-champaign 在 University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign - 首頁| Facebook 的評價
- 關於university of illinois--urbana-champaign 在 The Campus Tour | University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign ... 的評價
university of illinois--urbana-champaign 在 美國在台協會 AIT Facebook 的最佳貼文
「美國大學城 #CollegeTownUSA」系列
你曾經參加過美國大學的「回娘家」慶典嗎? 「Homecoming回娘家」是指大學的校友與大學城的居民們回到校園的年度傳統。一般公認伊利諾大學香檳分校(University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) 是這項傳統的發源地,歷史可追溯到1908年。香檳是美國大學城的典型代表,大學所在的區域甚至就直接叫 Campustown (校園城)! EducationUSA Taiwan #DestinationUSA
Have you ever participated in a homecoming celebration at a U.S. college or university? A homecoming is an annual tradition where school alumni and other college town residents are welcomed back to campus. The University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) ( University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) is credited with starting this tradition, back in 1908. UIUC is located in Champaign, Illinois. Champaign is such a good representation of a college town that the university district in the town is actually called Campustown!
Now that's a million dollar view 😍
We just wish it didn't feel like a million degrees outside 🔥
Stay safe out there, #Illini 😓☀️
university of illinois--urbana-champaign 在 Sam Tsang 曾思瀚 Facebook 的最佳解答
The very fact it's called "Third World" says a lot, and then they publish an article on the "benefit" of colonialism using selective data. I guess that didn't take long...You can't make this stuff up. Occidental hegemony corrected?
19 September 2017
LETTER OF RESIGNATION FROM MEMBERS OF THE EDITORIAL BOARD OF THIRD WORLD QUARTERLY
Dear Shahid Qadir, Taylor & Francis, Colleagues and Interested Public,
We are deeply disappointed by the unacceptable process around the publication of Bruce Gilley’s Viewpoint essay, “The case for colonialism,” which was published in Third World Quarterly without any consultation with the Editorial Board. As International Editorial Board Members, we were told in an email on 15 September from Shahid Qadir that this piece was put through the required double-blind peer review process. We asked for these reviews to be sent to the Editorial Board, and they were not.
We have now been informed by our colleagues who reviewed the piece for a Special Issue that they rejected it as unfit to send to additional peer review, and they stated in an email to us:
“We would question the editorial process that has led to the publication of the piece. It was initially offered to guest editors Dr John Narayan and Dr Leon Sealey-Huggins as an article to consider for inclusion in the aforementioned special issue. The guest editors relayed their unease with the article and rejected considering the piece for peer review. It has subsequently come to light that the article was later reviewed as a standard article and rejected by at least one reviewer and then repackaged as an opinion piece.”—email from Dr John Narayan (Birmingham City University)
Dr Leon Sealey-Huggins (Warwick University)
Dr Kehinde Andrews (Birmingham City University)
Dr Eugene Nulman (Birmingham City University)
Dr Goldie Osuri (University of Warwick)
Dr Lucia Pradella (King’s College London)
Professor Vijay Prashad (Trinity College)
Dr Sahar Rad (SOAS, University of London)
Professor Satnam Virdee (University of Glasgow)
Dr Helen Yaffe (London School of Economics)
We have also been informed through correspondence between Prof Ilan Kapoor and our colleague who was the peer-reviewer, after the piece was rejected by the Special Issue editors, that her review also rejected the Viewpoint. Thus, the fact is established that this did not pass the peer-review when we have documentation that it was rejected by three peer reviewers.
As the Viewpoint did not pass the double-blind peer review as claimed by the editor in the statement he issued in the name of the journal, it must be retracted and a new statement issued.
The Viewpoint fails criterion #1 of the Committee on Publication Ethics COPE guidelines that state: “Journal editors should consider retracting a publication if: they have clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g. data fabrication) or honest error (e.g. miscalculation or experimental error).” https://publicationethics.org/…/Retractions_COPE_gline_fina…
These COPE guidelines are Taylor & Francis’s reference documents for ethics of retracting a publication the editorial board was told in an email on 18 September by Shahid Qadir.
Thus, Bruce Gilley’s Viewpoint essay, “The case for colonialism” must be retracted, as it fails to provide reliable findings, as demonstrated by its failure in the double-blind peer review process.
We all subscribe to the principle of freedom of speech and the value of provocation in order to generate critical debate. However, this cannot be done by means of a piece that fails to meet academic standards of rigour and balance by ignoring all manner of violence, exploitation and harm perpetrated in the name of colonialism (and imperialism) and that causes offence and hurt and thereby clearly violates that very principle of free speech.
The Editor of TWQ has issued a public statement without any consultation with the Editorial Board that is not truthful about the process of this peer-review, and thus, as we fully disagree with both the academic content of the Viewpoint and the response issued in the name of the journal, we are forced to resign immediately from the Editorial Board of Third World Quarterly.
As scholars, we remain ever-committed to the ideals that this journal has stood for over the past 40 years, and we would consider serving on an Editorial Board under different editorial arrangements.
Sincerely,
Ilan Kapoor (York University, Canada)
Stefano Ponte (Copenhagen Business School, Denmark + Duke University, US)
Lisa Ann Richey(Roskilde University, Denmark + Duke University, US)
Mahmood Mamdani (Makerere Institute of Social Research, Uganda + Columbia University, US)
Asef Bayat (University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, US)
Naila Kabeer (London School of Economics and Political Science, UK)
Katie Willis (Royal Holloway University of London, UK)
David Simon (Chalmers Univ. of Technology, Sweden + Royal Holloway Univ. of London, UK)
Walden Bello (State University of New York at Binghamton, US)
Giles Mohan (The Open University, UK)
Ayesha Jalal (Tufts University, US)
Uma Kothari (University of Manchester, UK)
Vijay Prashad (Trinity College, US)
Klaus John Dodds (Royal Holloway University of London, UK)
Richard Falk (Princeton University, US)
university of illinois--urbana-champaign 在 The Campus Tour | University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign ... 的推薦與評價
In this tour video, Caitlin, a University of Illinois Urbana Champaign student, guides you through the most ... ... <看更多>
university of illinois--urbana-champaign 在 University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign - 首頁| Facebook 的推薦與評價
Illinois ' flagship public university, a world leader in research, teaching and public engagement. 美国伊利诺伊州尚佩恩61820. ... <看更多>