「in which statehood is not a requirement」
下文By 獨立這邊請
台北法案大家好像都在討論,閒聊一下
美國是很有趣的國家,它在各個領域,不論是入侵別的國家,或者對某個國家進行援助,幾乎毫無例外的會使用嚴謹的法律文字或者引用既有的法律規則,去說明自己的實踐在法律上的界線跟內容。
也因此,美國的對外行動至少在百年來,在國際法上一直都是很重要的觀察對象,吸引目光的程度大到,多數人會以為國際社會上它是唯一的行為者。吸引目光的能力大到,不論是被認為合法或非法行動,似乎它的影響壓過所有其他的國家行為者。
這其中一個很主要的理由,就是因為它會把自己的行動附加嚴謹的法律論述,不論你覺得它是在唬爛還是在包裝自己的惡意。這對多數的政治法律工作者來說都非常方便,因為不是每個其他的主要國家行為者都會做這樣的事,研究美國方便就方便在這。
這個台北法案講的大概有三項,一個是美國要強力支持台灣對外的正式外交關係,如果有人要亂搞,美國不能無視。一個是說,如果有法律條件允許的情形,美國要支持台灣加入國際組織。第三個,跟台灣繼續深化經貿關係。
今天只有要講第二個,先看原文。
It should be the policy of the United States—
(1) to advocate, as appropriate—
(A) for Taiwan’s membership in all international organizations in which statehood is not a requirement and in which the United States is also a participant; and
(B) for Taiwan to be granted observer status in other appropriate international organizations;
簡單講(不是精準翻譯請自己看),
如果任何國際組織容許 #不具國家地位 的會員資格,然後美國剛好也是參與者,則美國應採適當行動倡議支持台灣加入。
或者,其他適合的國際組織,美國也應該支持台灣作為 #觀察員。
很奇怪吧,支持參加國際組織就支持,幹嘛一定要強調「in which statehood is not a requirement」?
美國一直以來都分的很清楚啊,法律承認跟事實承認是不一樣的東西,跟默示承認也不一樣。而美國把「支持台灣」,跟「認為台灣不具有國家地位」兩件事分得很清楚。
多數觀察家也好媒體也好,幾乎都只要看到美國支持台灣的行動,就會延伸出「喔喔喔要承認台灣是國家了」、「這等於是承認台灣了吧」之類的語意,但這邊還是希望多一個人也好,去意識到在法律的角度,這些都是清楚具有不同意義的行動。
說穿了,那些國際組織把各種法律資格清清楚楚寫在章程裡,從正式會員到觀察員國到不要求為國家的觀察員等,那些就是法律的明文規定,是國家就是、不是國家就不是。而這種清楚界定的法律邊界,給了美國這樣習慣嚴謹論述法律的國家很大的方便,也就是分清楚自己的實踐以及對外的活動空間。
這些東西當然都是政治,但是不只是政治。這裡頭有清楚的法律關係,國際社會的運作也是,而美國這個主要的國家行為者並沒有認為台灣具有法律上主權國家的身分。
支持台灣,不等於認為台灣是國家,人家寫得很清楚,而那些其他的友台盟邦其實一直以來也都是這樣講的,包括澳洲日本加拿大歐盟國家等,一次又一次的長久以來都是如此,我們都把它們當塑膠。
請不要再用模糊的中文去誤導社會大眾,請認識並理解到這些友台外國政府到底政策內容如何。你連挺你的朋友講什麼都不認真聽,隨意誤解別人的友好,這對我們自己的處境和地位提升,恐怕不會有太多的幫助。
你如果連最友好的國家如何評價自己都不願意認真看待,我們要怎麼成為它們眼中的主權國家?好了冷水潑到這就好,我知道多數台灣人愛面子又只喜歡爽,趴踢繼續,有問題請去看封面圖或置頂文。
S.1678 — 116th Congress (2019-2020)
“Taiwan Allies International Protection and Enhancement Initiative (TAIPEI) Act of 2019”
https://reurl.cc/E7832g
同時也有1部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過38萬的網紅ajin,也在其Youtube影片中提到,這集是結局了。steam上的恐怖遊戲,層層恐懼團隊的新作。時間設定在2084年,你是一名菁英警探,收到從兒子發送來的詭異訊息後前往指定地點查看卻發現了一具屍體。無論讚與噓.都請點個評價吧!! 喜歡請訂閱,記得按鈴鐺接收新影片通知 https://goo.gl/vsZdxw #阿津 #恐怖遊戲 全部遊...
「observer評價」的推薦目錄:
- 關於observer評價 在 {Fish睬政治}孫博萮 Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於observer評價 在 騎呢.weak7.卜車呔 Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於observer評價 在 CUP 媒體 Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於observer評價 在 ajin Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於observer評價 在 [心得] Observer無雷推薦- 精華區Steam - 批踢踢實業坊 的評價
- 關於observer評價 在 《侵視者:系統還原》PS5遊戲演示Observer - YouTube 的評價
- 關於observer評價 在 esports招聘在PTT/mobile01評價與討論 - 手搖飲社群資訊站 的評價
- 關於observer評價 在 esports招聘在PTT/mobile01評價與討論 - 手搖飲社群資訊站 的評價
- 關於observer評價 在 葉榮鐘在書寫人物傳記時,對先賢 - Facebook 的評價
- 關於observer評價 在 [心得] Observer無雷推薦 的評價
- 關於observer評價 在 [開箱文]Observer雲端視訊遙控車 - Mobile01 的評價
- 關於observer評價 在 graphik font github. Then create a CSS file, src > assets > fonts ... 的評價
observer評價 在 騎呢.weak7.卜車呔 Facebook 的最佳貼文
【有關懷疑於荃灣警署發生的強姦案之刑事調查】
我們代表近日向警方報案、指控數名警員於荃灣警署強姦她的少女X。
少女X在預期警方會公正、保密並尊重她的私隱及尊嚴之下向警方報案。由始至終,她也並未就事件作出公開評論,也沒有打算以任何方式公開事件。
令人遺憾的是,負責調查少女X一案的警員似乎有系統地抹黑少女X以及她的投訴。警方刻意洩露有關案件的資料的舉動,會令任何客觀的旁觀者相信此舉是有意公開抹黑少女X並影響未來的起訴。
就警方近日洩露有關資料的行為,少女X希望透過我們發表以下聲明:
在2019年10月的某日,少女X鼓起勇氣,就她在荃灣警署內被強姦一事報案。她循正規的途徑報案,並在稍後向警方說出事情的詳細經過,亦回答了警方鉅細無遺及具侵略性的問題。一如警方所要求,她接受了法醫的檢查。她亦接受了終止懷孕的手術並容許法醫從胎兒取得DNA樣本作檢驗,以辨別至少一名施暴者。
在整個調查過程中,少女X重覆向警方查問案件的進度,但有關的調查隊伍拒絕向她提供任何詳情。
在2019年11月4日,少女X得知警方在沒有她的事前知悉或同意下,取得一份搜查令以檢取她的私人醫療紀錄,包括那些遠在案發之前的紀錄。該搜查令亦允許警方從她私人醫生的診所取得案發數日前後的閉路電視紀錄。
香港警務處發出的《罪行受害者約章》保障刑事案件受害者的私隱和尊嚴會在任何時候被尊重。而在強姦受害人不知情和沒有同意的情況下索取其私人醫療紀錄一舉完全侵犯了她的私隱權。此舉等同濫用警權,實在令人髮指。
少女X立刻訴諸法庭挑戰搜查令。2019年11月5日早上,發出搜查令的裁判官,經被詳細告知事實後,立刻命令暫緩執行搜查令。裁判官更頒下匿名令予少女X,禁止任何人(包括傳媒)不論直接或間接識別少女X的身份。違反匿名令可能被視為藐視法庭。
在過去數天,少女X為有關此案細節在網上洩漏一事感到憂悶。警察公共關係科及不具名的「警方消息人士」選擇性地透露疑似有關案件調查的細節,並對證據作出負面評價,此種種行徑會令任何客觀的旁觀者相信此舉是有意公開抹黑少女X並影響未來的起訴。
少女X認為,任何警方試圖貶損性暴力受害人名譽以及對證據作出負面評論的舉措是相當令人不齒以及具冒犯性的。此等行為應予最強烈的讉責。
毫不意外地,少女X無法信任香港警察可以公正地調查她的指控,又或任何與警員有關的指控。
少女X要求警方立即停止他們不合法且極不專業的資料披露,以及停止評論有關她的案件。她期望她的私隱能夠被尊重。
Criminal Investigation into Allegation of Rape inside Tsuen Wan Police Station.
We represent Ms X, a young Hong Kong female who recently filed a criminal complaint alleging that she was raped by a number of police officers in Tsuen Wan Police Station.
Ms X made her complaint to police in the expectation that it would be investigated with impartiality, in strict confidence, and with respect for her privacy and dignity. She has made no public comment about the case and has not sought publicity in any way.
Unfortunately, the police investigating Ms X’s case appear to have systematically worked to discredit her and to undermine her complaint. Police have deliberately leaked supposed details of the case in a manner which any objective observer would be driven to conclude, were directed at publicly discrediting Ms X and diminishing any prospect of a successful prosecution.
In light of the recent leaks and statements by the police, Ms X wishes us to issue the following statement.
On a date in October 2019, Ms X took the courageous step of filing a report to police about her rape inside Tsuen Wan Police Station. She filed her report through the proper channels. She subsequently gave a detailed account of the events to police, answering extensive and highly invasive questions. As requested by police, she underwent a forensic medical examination. Ms X further underwent a termination of the ensuing pregnancy and has permitted the taking of a DNA sample from the aborted foetus to assist in identifying at least one of her assailants.
Throughout the investigation, Ms X has repeatedly asked police for updates on the case but the investigating team has refused to provide her with any details whatsoever.
On 4th November, 2019 Ms X learned that police had, without her knowledge or consent, obtained a search warrant to seize her private medical records, including those long pre-dating the allegations. The warrant also allowed police to seize CCTV footage from her private doctor’s clinic for a period of several days before and after the date of the alleged rape.
The Hong Kong Police Force Victims’ Charter guarantees that the privacy and dignity of criminal complainants will be respected at all times. To seek to obtain a rape complainant’s private medical records without their knowledge and consent is a gross invasion of privacy. Such action was an outrageous abuse of police power.
Ms X immediately went to court to challenge the search warrant. On the morning of 5th November 2019, the issuing magistrate, having been properly apprised of the facts, immediately suspended the search warrant. The Magistrate further granted an Anonymity Order, which prevents any person (including the press) from identifying Ms X, whether directly or indirectly. A breach of the Anonymity Order may amount to a contempt of Court.
Over the past few days, Ms X has been deeply distressed to see alleged details of her case leak onto the internet. The Police Public Relations Bureau and unidentified ‘police sources’ have selectively released supposed details of the investigation, along with adverse comment on the evidence, in a way which any objective observer would be driven to conclude, were directed at publicly discrediting Ms X and diminishing any prospect of a successful prosecution.
Ms X considers that any attempt by police to publicly discredit a rape victim and adversely comment on evidence in an on-going investigation is despicable and offensive. Such attempts should be condemned in the strongest terms.
Unsurprisingly, Ms X has formed the view that the Hong Kong police force cannot be trusted to impartially investigate her allegations or indeed any criminal complaints relating to police officers.
Ms X demands that the police immediately cease the unlawful and grossly unprofessional leaking of information and comment about her case. She asks for her privacy to be respected.
observer評價 在 CUP 媒體 Facebook 的最佳貼文
韋智達律師行替荃灣警署強姦案少女發表聲明:
【有關懷疑於荃灣警署發生的強姦案之刑事調查】
我們代表近日向警方報案、指控數名警員於荃灣警署強姦她的少女X。
少女X在預期警方會公正、保密並尊重她的私隱及尊嚴之下向警方報案。由始至終,她也並未就事件作出公開評論,也沒有打算以任何方式公開事件。
令人遺憾的是,負責調查少女X一案的警員似乎有系統地抹黑少女X以及她的投訴。警方刻意洩露有關案件的資料的舉動,會令任何客觀的旁觀者相信此舉是有意公開抹黑少女X並影響未來的起訴。
就警方近日洩露有關資料的行為,少女X希望透過我們發表以下聲明:
在2019年10月的某日,少女X鼓起勇氣,就她在荃灣警署內被強姦一事報案。她循正規的途徑報案,並在稍後向警方說出事情的詳細經過,亦回答了警方鉅細無遺及具侵略性的問題。一如警方所要求,她接受了法醫的檢查。她亦接受了終止懷孕的手術並容許法醫從胎兒取得DNA樣本作檢驗,以辨別至少一名施暴者。
在整個調查過程中,少女X重覆向警方查問案件的進度,但有關的調查隊伍拒絕向她提供任何詳情。
在2019年11月4日,少女X得知警方在沒有她的事前知悉或同意下,取得一份搜查令以檢取她的私人醫療紀錄,包括那些遠在案發之前的紀錄。該搜查令亦允許警方從她私人醫生的診所取得案發數日前後的閉路電視紀錄。
香港警務處發出的《罪行受害者約章》保障刑事案件受害者的私隱和尊嚴會在任何時候被尊重。而在強姦受害人不知情和沒有同意的情況下索取其私人醫療紀錄一舉完全侵犯了她的私隱權。此舉等同濫用警權,實在令人髮指。
少女X立刻訴諸法庭挑戰搜查令。2019年11月5日早上,發出搜查令的裁判官,經被詳細告知事實後,立刻命令暫緩執行搜查令。裁判官更頒下匿名令予少女X,禁止任何人(包括傳媒)不論直接或間接識別少女X的身份。違反匿名令可能被視為藐視法庭。
在過去數天,少女X為有關此案細節在網上洩漏一事感到憂悶。警察公共關係科及不具名的「警方消息人士」選擇性地透露疑似有關案件調查的細節,並對證據作出負面評價,此種種行徑會令任何客觀的旁觀者相信此舉是有意公開抹黑少女X並影響未來的起訴。
少女X認為,任何警方試圖貶損性暴力受害人名譽以及對證據作出負面評論的舉措是相當令人不齒以及具冒犯性的。此等行為應予最強烈的讉責。
毫不意外地,少女X無法信任香港警察可以公正地調查她的指控,又或任何與警員有關的指控。
少女X要求警方立即停止他們不合法且極不專業的資料披露,以及停止評論有關她的案件。她期望她的私隱能夠被尊重。
Criminal Investigation into Allegation of Rape inside Tsuen Wan Police Station.
We represent Ms X, a young Hong Kong female who recently filed a criminal complaint alleging that she was raped by a number of police officers in Tsuen Wan Police Station.
Ms X made her complaint to police in the expectation that it would be investigated with impartiality, in strict confidence, and with respect for her privacy and dignity. She has made no public comment about the case and has not sought publicity in any way.
Unfortunately, the police investigating Ms X’s case appear to have systematically worked to discredit her and to undermine her complaint. Police have deliberately leaked supposed details of the case in a manner which any objective observer would be driven to conclude, were directed at publicly discrediting Ms X and diminishing any prospect of a successful prosecution.
In light of the recent leaks and statements by the police, Ms X wishes us to issue the following statement.
On a date in October 2019, Ms X took the courageous step of filing a report to police about her rape inside Tsuen Wan Police Station. She filed her report through the proper channels. She subsequently gave a detailed account of the events to police, answering extensive and highly invasive questions. As requested by police, she underwent a forensic medical examination. Ms X further underwent a termination of the ensuing pregnancy and has permitted the taking of a DNA sample from the aborted foetus to assist in identifying at least one of her assailants.
Throughout the investigation, Ms X has repeatedly asked police for updates on the case but the investigating team has refused to provide her with any details whatsoever.
On 4th November, 2019 Ms X learned that police had, without her knowledge or consent, obtained a search warrant to seize her private medical records, including those long pre-dating the allegations. The warrant also allowed police to seize CCTV footage from her private doctor’s clinic for a period of several days before and after the date of the alleged rape.
The Hong Kong Police Force Victims’ Charter guarantees that the privacy and dignity of criminal complainants will be respected at all times. To seek to obtain a rape complainant’s private medical records without their knowledge and consent is a gross invasion of privacy. Such action was an outrageous abuse of police power.
Ms X immediately went to court to challenge the search warrant. On the morning of 5th November 2019, the issuing magistrate, having been properly apprised of the facts, immediately suspended the search warrant. The Magistrate further granted an Anonymity Order, which prevents any person (including the press) from identifying Ms X, whether directly or indirectly. A breach of the Anonymity Order may amount to a contempt of Court.
Over the past few days, Ms X has been deeply distressed to see alleged details of her case leak onto the internet. The Police Public Relations Bureau and unidentified ‘police sources’ have selectively released supposed details of the investigation, along with adverse comment on the evidence, in a way which any objective observer would be driven to conclude, were directed at publicly discrediting Ms X and diminishing any prospect of a successful prosecution.
Ms X considers that any attempt by police to publicly discredit a rape victim and adversely comment on evidence in an on-going investigation is despicable and offensive. Such attempts should be condemned in the strongest terms.
Unsurprisingly, Ms X has formed the view that the Hong Kong police force cannot be trusted to impartially investigate her allegations or indeed any criminal complaints relating to police officers.
Ms X demands that the police immediately cease the unlawful and grossly unprofessional leaking of information and comment about her case. She asks for her privacy to be respected.
observer評價 在 ajin Youtube 的最佳貼文
這集是結局了。steam上的恐怖遊戲,層層恐懼團隊的新作。時間設定在2084年,你是一名菁英警探,收到從兒子發送來的詭異訊息後前往指定地點查看卻發現了一具屍體。無論讚與噓.都請點個評價吧!!
喜歡請訂閱,記得按鈴鐺接收新影片通知 https://goo.gl/vsZdxw
#阿津 #恐怖遊戲
全部遊戲播放清單 http://goo.gl/DUs8Ar
---同系列影片清單 https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEzqZq_wDhpfly2KVzBtJlGP2EfeFNejR
你好啊 └(^ω^)┐我是阿津,歡迎來觀看我的youtube頻道
頻道內容主要是錄製恐怖遊戲的實況影片
不時也會製作其他各種電玩遊戲的遊玩影片
每個禮拜的二六會在twitch開台直播
有興趣追隨的話可以在說明最下方找到網址連結
**直播台 https://www.twitch.tv/kamiyu666
//FB粉絲頁 https://www.facebook.com/tttd3/
![post-title](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/MLz0F2BvGv4/hqdefault.jpg)
observer評價 在 《侵視者:系統還原》PS5遊戲演示Observer - YouTube 的推薦與評價
![影片讀取中](/images/youtube.png)
侵視者:系統還原/观察者:系统还原》PS5遊戲演示 Observer : System Redux Gameplay。跟隨我們獨家的《侵視者:系統還原/观察者:系统还原》PS5版試玩一起 ... ... <看更多>
observer評價 在 esports招聘在PTT/mobile01評價與討論 - 手搖飲社群資訊站 的推薦與評價
在The esports observer這個討論中,有超過5篇Ptt貼文,作者iamshana也提到富比世2021女運動員收入榜:辛度第7 https://i.imgur.com/MVPJIww.jpg 7. ... <看更多>
observer評價 在 [心得] Observer無雷推薦- 精華區Steam - 批踢踢實業坊 的推薦與評價
遊戲名稱: >Observer_
商店頁面: https://store.steampowered.com/app/514900/observer/
Observer各方面都非常精緻的一款作品,由Layers of Fear的開發團隊製作,Observer和
層層恐懼一樣有著精緻的美術、細膩的對白跟恐怖迷幻的氣氛營造,只是Observer將這些
特質發揮到極致,劇情跟世界觀更加完整並將場景搬到衰敗的Cyberpunk末日世界。
玩家扮演的主角大叔是一名警員也是一名Observer(觀察者),有著可以插入疑犯的大腦中
樞窺視死人記憶的能力,主角為了調查失散多年的兒子死亡的真相闖入貧民窟。
遊戲時間不長,包含卡關迷路的時間大概是7-8小時可以破到結局,劇情推進偏慢但強大的
美術跟氣氛營造彌補了這點,壯麗科幻的大景、狹小陰濕的走道跟扭曲的幻想空間交錯出
現,每分每秒都是一種視覺享受,遊戲也常用各種下墜、glitch、旋轉的視覺效果跟音效玩弄玩家的感官,遊戲性
也蠻高的,解謎的部分還算有創意,躲怪物的關卡也很緊張刺激。
最後的結局也蠻值得玩味的,至少我自己有被騙到XD
這邊就先不暴雷了,總之大力推荐這款遊戲給喜歡劇情向遊戲跟Cyberpunk設定的版友!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 123.193.39.88
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Steam/M.1545542675.A.080.html
... <看更多>