今早為Asian Medical Students Association Hong Kong (AMSAHK)的新一屆執行委員會就職典禮作致詞分享嘉賓,題目為「疫情中的健康不公平」。
感謝他們的熱情款待以及為整段致詞拍了影片。以下我附上致詞的英文原稿:
It's been my honor to be invited to give the closing remarks for the Inauguration Ceremony for the incoming executive committee of the Asian Medical Students' Association Hong Kong (AMSAHK) this morning. A video has been taken for the remarks I made regarding health inequalities during the COVID-19 pandemic (big thanks to the student who withstood the soreness of her arm for holding the camera up for 15 minutes straight), and here's the transcript of the main body of the speech that goes with this video:
//The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, continues to be rampant around the world since early 2020, resulting in more than 55 million cases and 1.3 million deaths worldwide as of today. (So no! It’s not a hoax for those conspiracy theorists out there!) A higher rate of incidence and deaths, as well as worse health-related quality of life have been widely observed in the socially disadvantaged groups, including people of lower socioeconomic position, older persons, migrants, ethnic minority and communities of color, etc. While epidemiologists and scientists around the world are dedicated in gathering scientific evidence on the specific causes and determinants of the health inequalities observed in different countries and regions, we can apply the Social Determinants of Health Conceptual Framework developed by the World Health Organization team led by the eminent Prof Sir Michael Marmot, world’s leading social epidemiologist, to understand and delineate these social determinants of health inequalities related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
According to this framework, social determinants of health can be largely categorized into two types – 1) the lower stream, intermediary determinants, and 2) the upper stream, structural and macro-environmental determinants. For the COVID-19 pandemic, we realized that the lower stream factors may include material circumstances, such as people’s living and working conditions. For instance, the nature of the occupations of these people of lower socioeconomic position tends to require them to travel outside to work, i.e., they cannot work from home, which is a luxury for people who can afford to do it. This lack of choice in the location of occupation may expose them to greater risk of infection through more transportation and interactions with strangers. We have also seen infection clusters among crowded places like elderly homes, public housing estates, and boarding houses for foreign domestic helpers. Moreover, these socially disadvantaged people tend to have lower financial and social capital – it can be observed that they were more likely to be deprived of personal protective equipment like face masks and hand sanitizers, especially during the earlier days of the pandemic. On the other hand, the upper stream, structural determinants of health may include policies related to public health, education, macroeconomics, social protection and welfare, as well as our governance… and last, but not least, our culture and values. If the socioeconomic and political contexts are not favorable to the socially disadvantaged, their health and well-being will be disproportionately affected by the pandemic. Therefore, if we, as a society, espouse to address and reduce the problem of health inequalities, social determinants of health cannot be overlooked in devising and designing any public health-related strategies, measures and policies.
Although a higher rate of incidence and deaths have been widely observed in the socially disadvantaged groups, especially in countries with severe COVID-19 outbreaks, this phenomenon seems to be less discussed and less covered by media in Hong Kong, where the disease incidence is relatively low when compared with other countries around the world. Before the resurgence of local cases in early July, local spread of COVID-19 was sporadic and most cases were imported. In the earlier days of the pandemic, most cases were primarily imported by travelers and return-students studying overseas, leading to a minor surge between mid-March and mid-April of 874 new cases. Most of these cases during Spring were people who could afford to travel and study abroad, and thus tended to be more well-off. Therefore, some would say the expected social gradient in health impact did not seem to exist in Hong Kong, but may I remind you that, it is only the case when we focus on COVID-19-specific incidence and mortality alone. But can we really deduce from this that COVID-19-related health inequality does not exist in Hong Kong? According to the Social Determinants of Health Framework mentioned earlier, the obvious answer is “No, of course not.” And here’s why…
In addition to the direct disease burden, the COVID-19 outbreak and its associated containment measures (such as economic lockdown, mandatory social distancing, and change of work arrangements) could have unequal wider socioeconomic impacts on the general population, especially in regions with pervasive existing social inequalities. Given the limited resources and capacity of the socioeconomically disadvantaged to respond to emergency and adverse events, their general health and well-being are likely to be unduly and inordinately affected by the abrupt changes in their daily economic and social conditions, like job loss and insecurity, brought about by the COVID-19 outbreak and the corresponding containment and mitigation measures of which the main purpose was supposedly disease prevention and health protection at the first place. As such, focusing only on COVID-19 incidence or mortality as the outcomes of concern to address health inequalities may leave out important aspects of life that contributes significantly to people’s health. Recently, my research team and I collaborated with Sir Michael Marmot in a Hong Kong study, and found that the poor people in Hong Kong fared worse in every aspects of life than their richer counterparts in terms of economic activity, personal protective equipment, personal hygiene practice, as well as well-being and health after the COVID-19 outbreak. We also found that part of the observed health inequality can be attributed to the pandemic and its related containment measures via people’s concerns over their own and their families’ livelihood and economic activity. In other words, health inequalities were contributed by the pandemic even in a city where incidence is relatively low through other social determinants of health that directly concerned the livelihood and economic activity of the people. So in this study, we confirmed that focusing only on the incident and death cases as the outcomes of concern to address health inequalities is like a story half-told, and would severely truncate and distort the reality.
Truth be told, health inequality does not only appear after the pandemic outbreak of COVID-19, it is a pre-existing condition in countries and regions around the world, including Hong Kong. My research over the years have consistently shown that people in lower socioeconomic position tend to have worse physical and mental health status. Nevertheless, precisely because health inequality is nothing new, there are always voices in our society trying to dismiss the problem, arguing that it is only natural to have wealth inequality in any capitalistic society. However, in reckoning with health inequalities, we need to go beyond just figuring out the disparities or differences in health status between the poor and the rich, and we need to raise an ethically relevant question: are these inequalities, disparities and differences remediable? Can they be fixed? Can we do something about them? If they are remediable, and we can do something about them but we haven’t, then we’d say these inequalities are ultimately unjust and unfair. In other words, a society that prides itself in pursuing justice must, and I say must, strive to address and reduce these unfair health inequalities. Borrowing the words from famed sociologist Judith Butler, “the virus alone does not discriminate,” but “social and economic inequality will make sure that it does.” With COVID-19, we learn that it is not only the individuals who are sick, but our society. And it’s time we do something about it.
Thank you very much!//
Please join me in congratulating the incoming executive committee of AMSAHK and giving them the best wishes for their future endeavor!
Roger Chung, PhD
Assistant Professor, CUHK JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, @CUHK Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong 香港中文大學 - CUHK
Associate Director, CUHK Institute of Health Equity
institute of medicine中文 在 當張仲景遇上史丹佛 Facebook 的最佳貼文
新書推薦序文
網頁同名新書「當張仲景遇上史丹佛」即將出版,依照書籍出版慣例,會找幾位知名人士撰寫序文及簡單書評。然而,我們不願意只流於「客套」「俗套」,我們決定兩點準則來邀請序文及書評撰寫人:一是深刻了解我的背景,二是能仔細審閱書稿。非常感謝幾位老師、前輩、朋友的大力幫忙,不但撰寫序文或書評,也給我很多指教、反饋及深入討論。這裡先和讀者分享三篇序文,還有一些序文及書評仍在編輯中。繁體中文版計畫年底前正式出版,簡體中文版正在協商。至於英文版,那就還有很多工作要做,時間仍是個未知數。
=====
李飛飛:古老醫學現代化的挑戰之路
(人工智能專家、美國國家醫學院及國家工程學院雙院士、史丹佛大學工程學院講座教授)
我很榮幸地受邀推薦我摯友李宗恩博士的新書《當張仲景遇上史丹佛》。這本書很獨特, 李博士是一位資深的中醫專家和臨床醫生,卻也是一位經過嚴格科學訓練的科技人,在大膽蛻變深入中醫之前,他在矽谷有著成功的科技生涯。這本書反映了李博士與眾不同人生歷練下的洞悉力,文字清新流暢,內容時而讓人驚艷,時而讓人深思反省。
中醫和現代科學似乎是無限分開的兩個世界, 然而,李博士個人和他文筆下的討論,為讀者開啟了一個難得的窗口,窺見兩個充滿衝突卻又永遠相互纏繞世界的並存對偶性(duality of existence)。李博士的旅程,象徵著古老醫學現代化的挑戰之路,同時也象徵著對凡事以科技來定義的現代生活之深刻反思。李博士帶領我們尋求一種全新的方式來看待這兩個世界,我對李博士帶領我們探索的旅程深深感到興趣,也期許讀者一起參與這趟旅程!
Fei-Fei Li:Challenging path of the modernization of an ancient medicine
(Dr. Fei-Fei Li is a world leading expert in Artificial Intelligent. She is the inaugural Sequoia Professor in the Computer Science Department at Stanford University, Co-Director of Stanford’s Human-Centered AI Institute, and elected Member of both the US National Academy of Medicine and National Academy of Engineering.)
I’m honored and humbled to be asked to recommend my friend Dr. Andy Lee’s new book. I find this book very unique. The voice of Dr. Lee is that of a deep Chinese Medicine clinician and expert, but also a rigorously trained technologist who has carved a very successful career in the heart of Silicon Valley before the daring transition to a new career as a Chinese Medicine doctor. This book is a pleasantly easy and smooth read, yet oftentimes beautiful and introspective.
The worlds of Chinese Medicine and modern science seem to be infinitely apart, just like the worlds of Taiwan and the Silicon Valley. Yet, in Dr. Lee and his words, we the readers are given a rare glimpse into this duality of existence of two possibly conflicting yet eternally revolving worlds. The journey taken by Dr. Lee symbolizes the challenging path of the modernization of an ancient medicine, as well as a soulful reflection of the technologically defined modern lives. Dr. Lee is leading us to seek a new way of looking at both worlds. I’m intrigued by the journey that he is taking, and I sincerely invite the readers to join him on this journey together.
=====
李克明:帶你認識宏觀、科學、邏輯的中醫
(暢銷書《當孔子遇上哈佛》作者、前元大國際資產管理及元大創投公司董事長、由跨國商務律師金融高階經理人斜槓的傳世經典推廣者)
摯友李宗恩醫師的大作《當張仲景遇上史丹佛》問市,囑余作序;讓余有機會先睹為快,把書一口氣讀完,深有啟發!
這書可以勵志,宗恩兄生動自述了多次柳暗花明又一村的成長經歷,讀者會嘆道:有為者亦若是!
這本書記載了寶貴的中醫臨床醫術,以約三十個案例,分享了涉及的療程和依據的奧妙中醫醫理,有心的同道同好可以切磋研究!本書更闡述了宗恩兄所體悟的中醫醫道,毫無保留地分享了他所期許的中醫角色、醫病關係、「西醫檢測、中醫治療」!
中醫是中華文化的精髓,中國人都聽過中醫,許多人也看過中醫,就連外國人也知道針灸,但非中醫專業人員對中醫固然霧裡看花;中醫醫者亦受限於中醫的培育方式、產業結構及強勢西醫,也難免有故步自封、見樹不見林的迷失。
宗恩兄君子不器,斜槓人生,具備跨領域、扎實的專業訓練,故能在親炙倪海廈大師後,以宏觀廣角的視野、嚴謹的科學態度、縝密的邏輯思考,在多年臨床中驗證神奇奧妙的中醫醫理,並據此提出振興中醫的看法,讀來醍醐灌頂,茅塞頓開。
余強力推薦《當張仲景遇上史丹佛》!嚮往中華文化,想一窺中醫奧妙者該讀;想在治標的西醫之外,找到替代方案的中醫師、中醫同好、病人該讀;掌管國家醫療、公衛政策、中醫發展的領導者更應該閱讀!
=====
張慶瑞:物理忌妒 – 無用之用,是為大用
(台大特聘教授、中原大學講座教授、台灣大學前代理校長)
李宗恩是我剛回台灣任教時的學生,我是他應用數學的老師。台灣大學物理系的數學一直是物理系自己教,主要邏輯是物理系用的數學是要解決物理的工具,這與數學系的數學概念並不相同。宗恩當時是資優保送生,物理系那時有一群非常優秀的高中保送生,同儕互相刺激,要拿到高分非常困難。宗恩不但成績好又很外向,喜歡發問,而且他與他夫人是當時物理系的班對,所以我印象非常深刻。
他畢業後,我斷斷續續由同學口中聽到他的職涯轉變,但並未特別放在心上。一直 到二○○九年,我因為在國科會國合處服務,到美國史丹佛大學訪視當時我參與啟動的Stanford-Taiwan Biotechnology (STB),聽到宗恩居然已經變成灣區的名中醫師,有點訝異,但也不是特別難理解。因為聰明的人,只要有恆心,做什麼事都會成功。
後來,我們就一直透過微信聯絡。二○一六年,我擔任台大副校長時,因為參加台大北加州校友會,與宗恩面對面深入交談,才知道他因為困惑於父親的疾病,而深入研究醫學,進而拜入倪海廈門下,成為關門弟子。他那時就告訴我不少神奇故事,我那時由於事務繁忙,對於這類我理解知識以外的事情,基本上是聽了就儲存在腦中,作為日後備用的資料。
二○一九年我離開行政職後,便有許多時間思考,跨領域學問引起了我極大的興趣。 物理訓練最強大與扎實的是科學邏輯方法論,複雜系統模型簡單化再加上數學預測化。 其實,物理真正的本質訓練就在以簡馭繁,好的物理學家對事物的看法具備強大的簡約能 力。
在一九七○年代,科學界出現一個有趣的名詞叫「物理忌妒」(Physics Envy),就是 生物學家及其他領域的學者看到數學在物理學科如此成功,就想要複製物理成功的經驗;奇怪的是,只有在少數有些許成效,但基本上無法像物理一樣成功!也因此忌妒物理可以成功使用數學。物理忌妒不是忌妒物理,而是忌妒為什麼數學工具只能在物理上成功?看起來像是上帝特別寵愛物理,便引起大家忌妒。
領域的互動永遠是新知識的淵藪,現代的斜槓世代就是跨多領域的人才,然而老祖 宗卻告訴我們「鼯鼠五技而窮」,顯然歷史法則指出:沒有專精學門,是不容易出人頭地的。今日由於學問複雜與廣泛性提升,有些學問必須要跨領域互動才能了解與掌握問題所在,進而激發出解決的科學方法。而且這些跨領域互動初期必須沒有目的,才有機會激發出原創想法。
我最近與三創文化基金會合作推動「無用論壇」,就是希望利用跨領域對談培養一流人才。宗恩跨多學科的過程,學習動機多以好奇心為出發點,從未想到有用沒用。今天能成為華人界中醫祭酒,就是「無用之用,是為大用」的最佳典範。
《當張仲景遇上史丹佛》這本書的內容,雖然只是記載宗恩多年來所看到的各種疑難雜症,但從書名就知道這裡面其實也傳達了現代跨領域的重要意念,更嘗試由現代科學來看中醫的邏輯。
我最近常與跨領域人談知識論,知識大致可分成:
一、知道的知道:工程
二、知道的不知道:待了解的學問,也是已知與未知的交界
三、不知道的知道:經驗法則,但常可以重現
四、不知道的不知道:怪談與傳說
人類累積的已知愈來愈多,「知道的不知道」就愈多。物理學現有的知識是標準的 「知道的知道」,但是有許多學問我們不斷在使用,也很有效,但卻不完全知其所以然,我稱之為「不知道的知道」。中醫就是其中一種,這就是直覺與經驗的累積。
中醫的重現率不像物理學那般精準,也在於不完全知其所以然,所以急需要累積更多的數據,並有時間由「不知道的知道」發展轉化成「知道的知道」的狀態,這非常需要利用物理學的既有發展經驗來協助加速轉化的過程。宗恩具有充分的跨多領域專業訓練,相信在取得更多的中醫案例後,將有大智慧將中醫推動成「知道的知道」範疇。宗恩傳承東漢張仲景延續至倪海廈的正宗中醫思維,再結合台大物理系的科學邏輯基礎訓練,經歷史丹佛與矽谷應用科技的淬鍊,中學為體,西學為用,未來必定能真正完成「西醫精準化檢測,中醫客製化治療」的至高無上理想。將宏 觀醫學與微觀醫學並用,強固個體本身,隔絕入侵病毒。
本書是宗恩超越張仲景的起點,胡適的朋友以「我的朋友是胡適之」為榮,我深為 「我的學生是李宗恩」為傲。
=====
(http://andylee.pro/wp/?p=8966)
#當張仲景遇上史丹佛
institute of medicine中文 在 Roger Chung 鍾一諾 Facebook 的最佳解答
【香港是全球最長壽人口 -- 但這是一個假象嗎?】
非常榮幸與「健康公平」一代宗師Micahel Marmot爵士合寫了這篇探討香港何以是全世界最長壽人口的文章,刊登於美國國家醫學學院(National Academy of Medicine)的官方期刊"NAM Perspectives"中。文章中,我們嘗試提出幾個主要原因,亦嘗試為某些解釋提出異議。
我們嘗試問:這是否與整體經濟發展有關?但其他經濟比香港更發達的地方也沒有香港人口那麼長壽,因此,必然有其他因素在影響港人的健康。我們亦在問:傳統的理解上,在發達國家中,貧富懸殊越厲害,整體健康越差;但這關聯亦未明顯出現於香港中,為甚麼呢?顯然有其他重要的因素向貧富懸殊對健康的負面影響作出了保護作用。我們發現明顯的分別是香港比英國及美國在主要健康及社會指標上都做得更好,包括:較低的嬰兒死亡率、較低的青少年懷孕出生率、較高的青少年就讀與就業比率、較低的兇殺與暴力比率以及較低的犯罪率(儘管香港近半年見證了歷史上最動蕩的時刻)等。一直都有人提出的可能原因包括非西方的飲食、香港較小和集中的基建環境在各式各樣日常生活中所帶來的方便、以及不極端的氣候。話雖如此,香港的人均肉類消耗量是全球之冠,而有其他擁有温和氣候的國家的人民亦不那麼長壽。亦有人提出港人長壽可以歸功於公營醫療系統的存在,但我們都知道大部份的人是病了才會出現於醫療體制之中,而且研究更指出公營醫療系統未能有效解決貧窮人得不到適切醫療的問題(因為經濟原因得不到適切醫療的香港人口高達8.4%)。換句話說,港人長壽是因為香港擁有好的醫療體制一說有欠說服力。
我們在文中再提出兩個潛在但被人忽視的原因 -- 1) 所謂的年代效應,即是現在步入人生最後階段的都是戰後生存下來的強人,他們的後代會否像他們一樣擁有那麼強的適應及生命力是一個疑問;2) 我們看到的是一個平均數,一個被一小撮極富裕的人拉高了的平均數,而事實上,在香港越貧窮的人,健康普遍來說便越差。
因此,我們要對全球最長壽人口這個美譽非常警惕,尤其確實存在於香港的多方面社會不公會累積下來,為未來的健康帶來負面的影響。
(這是中文大學成立健康公平研究所(CUHK Institute of Health Equity)後的首篇發表文章。)
Link: https://nam.edu/people-in-hong-kong-have-the-longest-life-expectancy-in-the-world-some-possible-explanations/
#SirMichaelMarmot
#HealthEquity
#HongKong
#Lifeexpectancy
#CUHKInstituteofHealthEquity