關於 how to be a maintenance man ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

Your Body is God’s Temple

““Foods for the belly, and the belly for foods,” but God will bring to nothing both it and them. But the body is not for sexual immorality, but for the Lord; and the Lord for the body. Now God raised up the Lord, and will also raise us up by his power. Don’t you know that your bodies are members of Christ? Shall I then take the members of Christ, and make them members of a prostitute? May it never be! Or don’t you know that he who is joined to a prostitute is one body? For, “The two”, he says, “will become one flesh.” But he who is joined to the Lord is one spirit. Flee sexual immorality! “Every sin that a man does is outside the body,” but he who commits sexual immorality sins against his own body. Or don’t you know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit who is in you, whom you have from God? You are not your own, for you were bought with a price. Therefore glorify God in your body and in your spirit, which are God’s.” (1 Corinthians‬ ‭6:13-20‬ ‭WEB‬‬)

I believe that seeing your body as God’s temple will transform the way you treat it.

If God had designed for us to still be worshipping Him in a temple built of gold, wood, and stones, would you go and defile the walls with graffiti, toss lots of junk into it, have your way with prostitutes inside, and let it fall into disrepute? No way, right?

Probably the number one reason why we don’t treat our bodies right is because we are not conscious of it being God’s temple.

We go around daily, thinking that the condition of our body is not that important, and that other things are more urgent.

When we get busy, hydration is neglected, meals are skipped or irregular, exercise is dropped, hygiene is forgotten, sleep is sacrificed, and the body is just sadly abused.

The body is the house of the Holy Spirit, and we ought to treat it right.

If the president (or someone else of a much higher rank that you respect) announces one day that he will be staying at your house, you will surely clean up the house and prepare it nicely right?

Then why are we so casual when God is dwelling in our body, and He has promised to stay forever? Does He not deserve the grandest, most glorious house with the best maintenance?

Thankfully, we have a better way than natural methods to care for God’s temple. If your body is in a bad state, and needs some major renovation, the Holy Spirit can work an awesome transformation by His power. It is a change that everyone can see.

“Younger and Younger: 31 Days of God’s Youth Renewal Promises” was birthed from a rhema word that I received from within. “Younger and younger.” It was a season about learning how to renew my youth by God’s way, and become overall healthier, stronger, and more beautiful.

Since then, many readers have given good feedback, expressing that people around them also started commenting that they look younger, after they applied the truths shared within the book.

Some readers especially love the “Eternal Youth Declarations Audio” that comes as a bonus mp3 file to recap on the youth declarations in the book, and it’s also a good way to have God’s youth renewal promises confessed over you all day long. Soaking yourself in God’s word is always a powerful, life-giving, and beneficial activity.

Check out “Younger and Younger” here: https://bit.ly/younger-and-younger

MG X ลงทุนแมน
การเปลี่ยนถ่ายจาก รถเครื่องยนต์สันดาป สู่ EV Car ในประเทศไทย

รถยนต์คันแรกที่วิ่งบนถนนเมืองไทยเกิดขึ้นปี พ.ศ. 2447
หรือเมื่อ 116 ปีที่แล้ว ซึ่งเจ้าพระยาสุรศักดิ์มนตรี เป็นคนนำเข้ามาจากยุโรป
...Continue ReadingMG X invest man
Transformation from combustion engine to EV Car in Thailand

The first car to run on Thailand road happened in the year. B.E. 2447
Or 116 years ago that Chao Phraya Surasak Montri was imported from Europe.

But when the reign of King Rama 5, he saw that it was difficult to use, he ordered German companies to assemble Mercedes to be a throne car that used fuel as a throne.

Over time in Thailand, there are many car brands happening. Both Japanese and European brands have come to set up factory in Thailand.

Until now Thailand becomes the world's number 11 car production base.

Have you ever noticed that from the beginning of 100 years ago to today?
The thing that doesn't change is that most road cars are still combustion engines.
To rely on oil which causes pollution air and pollution noise.

In spite of this time, car camps around the world have created smoke-free automotive technology. Powered by electric energy.
So why is the car that uses combustion engine still running on the road of Thailand?

Investing man will try to analyze it.

The reason combustion engine cars are the most popular in our house.
Apart from every camp, the manufacturer has many models of cars to choose from as they wish.
Another important thing is that it's easy to sell price. It's a market that is easy to buy and sell easily. Whether it's a new or used car.

But the thing that we have to exchange is that the environment is negative from toxic fumes, we have to pay for gas each month. On average, combustion engine car with 1 litres of oil will run 10-15 kilometers.

At the end, it's a busy maintenance fee because there must be consistent check and maintenance of the engine.
Until a time later, HEV hybrid car technology is leading battery and electric motor.
Come in to help make cars more powerful and save more oil.

There are many types of hybrids working methods. It depends on the design of the electric transmission system. It helps to start faster, save more oil or bring electricity to help engine all the time to improve energy.

And another option to market is to operate the electric motor, wheel drive, but it all comes from the ′′ generator that serves the electrical power ′′ engine so that cars can use the advantages of electric motor. That's a quick start. Waiting for the engine round

Which, in any way, the hybrid system still needs to be gased for the engine and exhaust like combustion engine.

And what makes hybrids so unsuccessful is selling more expensive than combustion engine vehicles and engine maintenance costs.

A system that develops later is a hybrid plug-in or a system that adds external energy. This charging system allows cars to be more powerful than before. Electricity in low speeds. Further and more fuel saving, but even more so, the main energy is still oiled while electricity is more supplementary.

As the past 3 systems could fix the fuel saving and better power, but the toxic fumes were created from combustion engine couldn't solve the pollution PM2. 5 pollution.

This is why some car camps are innovating that won't need engine power anymore. That's 100 % electric cars using 100 % electricity and cut off all engine systems which can be recharged from. Exterior and store power at battery. When power is driven, electricity will be sent to motor to drive wheels.

And when cars don't need to drive, which means we don't need to pay for gas, no engine maintenance, no oil, and 100 % electricity usage. It makes driving time no noise, no poisonous smoke.

100 % of electric cars will change our lifestyle from gas station to travel to charging at home similar to mobile phones. Our society is a clean society without PM2. 5 anymore.

By 100 % electric car or BEV Car, it's going to be a leap growing global sales.

Year 2010 Sales of 100 % BEV worldwide 2,881 cars.
Year 2019 Sales of 100 % BEV worldwide 1,502,798 cars.
Only 9 years. BEV Car grows 52,062 %

At this time, there are over 4.5 million BEV car cars running across the globe.
The country with the most BEV cars running on the road is China with approximately 2.5 million cars.
Or think about 55 % of all BEV Car in the world. Secondary is USA and European countries.

The most important reason why BEV Car in many countries around the world is growing. Government bombs support both car manufacturers tax structures to tax deductible to citizens if they buy BEV Car.

Because at this time, many countries are terrified of the climate getting worse.
Specifically, China where many cities are falling in the circle of dust. PM2. 5
And this is happening to Thailand too.

Many people are asking how is the status of the sky train market 100 % BEV Car in our house?

Believe it or not, the EV Car in Thailand includes all-driven vehicles, both hybrid and hybrid plug-ins. Only 1.2 hundred thousand or 1.2 % of personalized cars. All across the country
And in that total, only 1,500 cars are 100 % electric cars or BEV.
The reason BEV Car in Thailand hasn't been informed. Born like other countries.
I have to admit that part of the promotion of the government is not as intense as it should be.
The next thing is that the sale price is still pretty high.

Because no car camp is currently able to produce an EV Car in the country. It costs all of them for import tax.

This story has resulted in the price of BEV Car on the market. Most of them are price starts from 1.8 million Baht.

When things are like this, it makes MG see the gap with importing BEV Car ′′ MG ZS EV ′′
With benefits of import tax 0 % from FTA Thai - China trade policy.

From now on, MG ZS EV can make a sale price of up to 1.19 million baht, cheaper than other BEV Car camps apparently.

This model car has a highlight. It's fully charged 1 times. It can be 337 kilometers and battery guarantee for 8 years.

The thing to follow is
So when are we going to see BEV Car of other car camps. It's priced for normal people to access like MG ZS EV.
So when will we see BEV Car under a million baht like other countries?
So when will we see BEV Car charging at all locations like gas stations.

The answer should be about
Car factory in Thailand will mainly change from the manufacturing of combustion cars.
When will I become a full EV Car?
And how much electric car charging stations will be promoted
This is based on government policies.
And the public sector needs to push it happen too.

And if that day comes
When BEV Car runs on the streets of Thailand

Our eyes won't see black smoke
Our nose won't breathe poisonous smoke
Our ears won't listen loudly from the engine

And it's that time on the road in Thailand
Will be friendly for us all..

References
- Siam Commercial Bank Economic Research Center (SCB EIC)
- MG Sale (Thailand) Co Ltd.Translated

根據計算，100萬人遊行隊伍要從維多利亞公園排到廣東；200萬人遊行則要排到泰國。

順道一提香港15～30歲人口約莫100出頭萬人。以照片人群幾乎都是此年齡帶來看，兩個數字都是明顯誇大太多了。

另一個可以參考的是1969年的Woodstock Music & Art Fair，幾天內湧進40萬人次，照片看起來也是滿山滿谷的人。（http://sites.psu.edu/…/upl…/sites/851/2013/01/Woodstock3.jpg）

當年40萬人次引發驚人的大塞車，幾乎花十幾個小時才逐漸清場。

而香港遊行清場速度明顯快得多。

順道一提，因此運動而認定「你的父母不愛你」的白痴論述也如同文化大革命時的「爹親娘親不如毛主席親」般開始出現：

https://www.facebook.com/SaluteToHKPolice/videos/350606498983830/UzpfSTUyNzM2NjA3MzoxMDE1NjMyMTM4NjY3MTA3NA/

EVERY MAJOR NEWS outlet in the world is reporting that two million people, well over a quarter of our population, joined a single protest.
.
It’s an astonishing thought that filled an enthusiastic old marcher like me with pride. Unfortunately, it’s almost certainly not true.
.
A march of two million people would fill a street that was 58 kilometers long, starting at Victoria Park in Hong Kong and ending in Tanglangshan Country Park in Guangdong, according to one standard crowd estimation technique.
.
If the two million of us stood in a queue, we’d stretch 914 kilometers (568 miles), from Victoria Park to Thailand. Even if all of us marched in a regiment 25 people abreast, our troop would stretch towards the Chinese border.
.
Yes, there was a very large number of us there. But getting key facts wrong helps nobody. Indeed, it could hurt the protesters more than anyone.
.
For math geeks only, here’s a discussion of the actual numbers that I hope will interest you whatever your political views.
.
.
DO NUMBERS MATTER?
.
People have repeatedly asked me to find out “the real number” of people at the recent mass rallies in Hong Kong.
.
I declined for an obvious reason: There was a huge number of us. What does it matter whether it was hundreds of thousands or a million? That’s not important.
.
But my critics pointed out that the word “million” is right at the top of almost every report about the marches. Clearly it IS important.
.
.
FIRST, THE SCIENCE
.
In the west, drone photography is analyzed to estimate crowd sizes.
.
This reporter apologizes for not having found a comprehensive database of drone images of the Hong Kong protests.
.
But we can still use related methods, such as density checks, crowd-flow data and impact assessments. Universities which have gathered Hong Kong protest march data using scientific methods include Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, University of Hong Kong, and Hong Kong Baptist University.
.
.
DENSITY CHECKS
.
Figures gathered in the past by Hong Kong Polytechnic specialists using satellite photo analysis found a density level of one square meter per marcher. Modern analysis suggests this remains roughly accurate.
.
I know from experience that Hong Kong marches feature long periods of normal spacing (one square meter or one and half per person, walking) and shorter periods of tight spacing (half a square meter or less per person, mostly standing).
.
.
JOINERS AND SPEED
.
We need to include people who join halfway. In the past, a Hong Kong University analysis using visual counting methods cross-referenced with one-on-one interviews indicated that estimates should be boosted by 12% to accurately reflect late joiners. These days, we’re much more generous in estimating joiners.
.
As for speed, a Hong Kong Baptist University survey once found a passing rate of 4,000 marchers every ten minutes.
.
Videos of the recent rallies indicates that joiner numbers and stop-start progress were highly erratic and difficult to calculate with any degree of certainty.
.
.
DISTANCE MULTIPLIED BY DENSITY
.
But scientists have other tools. We know the walking distance between Victoria Park and Tamar Park is 2.9 kilometers. Although there was overspill, the bulk of the marchers went along Hennessy Road in Wan Chai, which is about 25 meters (or 82 feet) wide, and similar connected roads, some wider, some narrower.
.
Steve Doig, a specialist in crowd analysis approached by the Columbia Journalism Review (CJR), analyzed an image of Hong Kong marchers to find a density level of 7,000 people in a 210-meter space. Although he emphasizes that crowd estimates are never an exact science, that figure means one million Hong Kong marchers would need a street 18.6 miles long – which is 29 kilometers.
.
Extrapolating these figures for the June 16 claim of two million marchers, you’d need a street 58 kilometers long.
.
Could this problem be explained away by the turnover rate of Hong Kong marchers, which likely allowed the main (three kilometer) route to be filled more than once?
.
The answer is yes, to some extent. But the crowd would have to be moving very fast to refill the space a great many times over in a single afternoon and evening. It wasn’t. While I can walk the distance from Victoria Park to Tamar in 41 minutes on a quiet holiday afternoon, doing the same thing during a march takes many hours.
.
More believable: There was a huge number of us, but not a million, and certainly not two million.
.
.
IMPACT MEASUREMENTS
.
A second, parallel way of analyzing the size of the crowd is to seek evidence of the effects of the marchers’ absence from their normal roles in society.
.
If we extract two million people out of a population of 7.4 million, many basic services would be severely affected while many others would grind to a complete halt.
.
Manpower-intensive sectors of society, such as transport, would be badly affected by mass absenteeism. Industries which do their main business on the weekends, such as retail, restaurants, hotels, tourism, coffee shops and so on would be hard hit. Round-the-clock operations such as hospitals and emergency services would be severely troubled, as would under-the-radar jobs such as infrastructure and utility maintenance.
.
There seems to be no evidence that any of that happened in Hong Kong.
.
.
HOW DID WE GET INTO THIS MESS?
.
To understand that, a bit of historical context is necessary.
.
In 2003, a very large number of us walked from Victoria Park to Central. The next day, newspapers gave several estimates of crowd size.
.
The differences were small. Academics said it was 350,000 plus. The police counted 466,000. The organizers, a group called the Civil Rights Front, rounded it up to 500,000.
.
No controversy there. But there was trouble ahead.
.
.
THINGS FALL APART
.
At a repeat march the following year, it was obvious to all of us that our numbers were far lower that the previous year. The people counting agreed: the academics said 194,000 and the police said 200,000.
.
But the Civil Rights Front insisted that there were MORE than the previous year’s march: 530,000 people.
.
The organizers lost credibility even with us, their own supporters. To this day, we all quote the 2003 figure as the high point of that period, ignoring their 2004 invention.
.
.
THE TRUTH COUNTS
.
The organizers had embarrassed the marchers. The following year several organizations decided to serve us better, with detailed, scientific counts.
.
After the 2005 march, the academics said the headcount was between 60,000 and 80,000 and the police said 63,000. Separate accounts by other independent groups agreed that it was below 100,000.
.
But the organizers? The Civil Rights Front came out with the awkward claim that it was a quarter of a million. Ouch. (This data is easily confirmed from multiple sources in newspaper archives.)
.
.
AN UNEXPECTED TWIST
.
But then came a twist. Some in the Western media chose to present ONLY the organizer’s “outlier” claim.
.
“Dressed in black and chanting ‘one man, one vote’, a quarter of a million people marched through Hong Kong yesterday,” said the Times of London in 2005.
.
“A quarter of a million protesters marched through Hong Kong yesterday to demand full democracy from their rulers in Beijing,” reported the UK Independent.
.
It became obvious that international media outlets were committed to emphasizing whichever claim made the Hong Kong government (and by extension, China) look as bad as possible. Accuracy was nowhere in the equation.
.
.
STRATEGICALLY CHOSEN
.
At universities in Hong Kong, there were passionate discussions about the apparent decision to pump up the numbers as a strategy, with the international media in mind. Activists saw two likely positive outcomes.
.
First, anyone who actually wanted the truth would choose a middle point as the “real” number: thus it was worth making the organizers’ number as high as possible. (The police could be presented as corrupt puppets of Beijing.)
.
Second, international reporters always favored the largest number, since it implicitly criticized China. Once the inflated figure was established in the Western media, it would become the generally accepted figure in all publications.
.
Both of the activists’ predictions turned out to be bang on target. In the following years, headcounts by social scientists and police were close or even impressively confirmed the other—but were ignored by the agenda-driven international media, who usually printed only the organizers’ claims.
.
.
SKIP THIS SECTION
.
Skip this section unless you want additional examples to reinforce the point.
.
In 2011, researchers and police said that between 63,000 and 95,000 of us marched. Our delightfully imaginative organizers multiplied by four to claim there were 400,000 of us.
.
In 2012, researchers and police produced headcounts similar to the previous year: between 66,000 and 97,000. But the organizers claimed that it was 430,000. (These data can also be easily confirmed in any newspaper archive.)
.
.
SKIP THIS SECTION TOO
.
Unless you’re interested in the police angle. Why are police figures seen as lower than others? On reviewing data, two points emerge.
.
First, police estimates rise and fall with those of independent researchers, suggesting that they function correctly: they are not invented. Many are slightly lower, but some match closely and others are slightly higher. This suggests that the police simply have a different counting method.
.
Second, police sources explain that live estimates of attendance are used for “effective deployment” of staff. The number of police assigned to work on the scene is a direct reflection of the number of marchers counted. Thus officers have strong motivation to avoid deliberately under-estimating numbers.
.
.
RECENT MASS RALLIES
.
Now back to the present: this hot, uncomfortable summer.
.
Academics put the 2019 June 9 rally at 199,500, and police at 240,000. Some people said the numbers should be raised or even doubled to reflect late joiners or people walking on parallel roads. Taking the most generous view, this gave us total estimates of 400,000 to 480,000.
.
But the organizers, God bless them, claimed that 1.03 million marched: this was four times the researchers’ conservative view and more than double the generous view.
.
The addition of the “.03m” caused a bit of mirth among social scientists. Even an academic writing in the rabidly pro-activist Hong Kong Free Press struggled to accept it. “Undoubtedly, the anti-amendment group added the extra .03 onto the exact one million figure in order to give their estimate a veneer of accuracy,” wrote Paul Stapleton.
.
.
MIND-BOGGLING ESTIMATE
.
But the vast majority of international media and social media printed ONLY the organizers’ eyebrow-raising claim of a million plus—and their version soon fed back into the system and because the “accepted” number. (Some mentioned other estimates in early reports and then dropped them.)
.
The same process was repeated for the following Sunday, June 16, when the organizers’ frankly unbelievable claim of “about two million” was taken as gospel in the majority of international media.
.
“Two million people in Hong Kong protest China's growing influence,” reported Fox News.
.
“A record two million people – over a quarter of the city’s population” joined the protest, said the Guardian this morning.
.
“Hong Kong leader apologizes as TWO MILLION take to the streets,” said the Sun newspaper in the UK.
.
Friends, colleagues, fellow journalists—what happened to fact-checking? What happened to healthy skepticism? What happened to attempts at balance?
.
.
CONCLUSIONS?
.
I offer none. I prefer that you do your own research and draw your own conclusions. This is just a rough overview of the scientific and historical data by a single old-school citizen-journalist working in a university coffee shop.
.
I may well have made errors on individual data points, although the overall message, I hope, is clear.
.
Hong Kong people like to march.
.
We deserve better data.
.
We need better journalism. Easily debunked claims like “more than a quarter of the population hit the streets” help nobody.
.
International media, your hostile agendas are showing. Raise your game.
.
Organizers, stop working against the scientists and start working with them.
.
Hong Kong people value truth.
.
We’re not stupid. (And we’re not scared of math!)

Listen on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/7LETu0CMSqNBM5fFuqywfB?si=t1y0FZQITU2VSlllZbuKLw

Sylvia and Nina are fierce, alpha and very thirsty sisters that do not need a man. They are riding the highs of their careers and are unstoppable! Find out more about what they have to say about toxic masculinity and being a career driven woman in today’s society.

02:29 who did Sylvia cultivate the domineering personality from

14:20 Working Women in the 21st century

15:05 Nina Sharing About How Being an Alpha Women will Affect their Relationship

18:35 Sylvia Sharing about a Successful Alpha Relationship

28:38 Alpha Women has Low Maintenance

32:20 How to Capture an Alpha Women’s heart

36:14 How to Capture Sylvia’s heart


Sylvia and Nina are not your typical influencers; they give it to you raw and real! Join them as they quench their never-ending thirst for wisdom, trends, success and men.

They explore hot and pressing issues you never thought you needed to know in this extremely in-depth podcast. Sisters, brothers and everyone in between or beyond; jump in and be thirsty!


Support us! https://www.patreon.com/noc. Join our Patreon to watch our videos early! 

CLICK TO BE A THIRSTY SISTER
https://www.youtube.com/thethirstysisters

FOLLOW 
https://www.instagram.com/thethirstysisterstts
http://www.noc.com.sg 
anchor.fm/thethirstysisters


FIND THE TEAM ON INSTAGRAM
Find us on Instagram:
Sylvia - https://www.instagram.com/sylsylnoc
Nina - https://www.instagram.com/ninatsf

EMAIL
For business/brand features: thirstysisters@noc.com.sg.
For talent engagements: bella@noc.com.sg, sylvia@noc.com.sg.

ADDRESS
North View Bizhub
6 Yishun Industrial Street 1, #01-14
Singapore 768090

NOC PARTNERS
Cathay Photo - http://www.cathayphoto.com.sg/
MyRepublic - https://secure.myrepublic.com.sg/
Shunji Matsuo - http://www.shunjimatsuo.com.sg/                
Flesh Imp - http://shop.fleshimp.com
Imba Interactive - https://www.facebook.com/IMBAinteractive
TopGear PC - https://www.topgearpc.com / 
Bosch - https://www.bosch-home.com.sg/
Aftershock - https://www.aftershockpc.com/

The Thirsty Sisters STAFF
Co-Founder - Sylvia Chan 
Co-Founder - Nina Tan
Producer - Nicole Liel
Assistant Director/Editor - Virus Tan
Crew Lead/Editor - Bryant Lee
Crew/Editor - Brandon Gwee
Crew/Editor - Charmaine Zheng
Crew/Editor - Priscilia Tan
Crew/Editor - Isaac Lim
Crew/Editor - Matt Mohamed
Crew/Motion Graphics Designer - Kher Chyn 
Crew/Motion Graphics Designer - Bryan Seah
Crew/Motion Graphics Designer - Vanessa
Crew/Sound Engineer - Yu En

PSSST...
While we respect everyone's views and opinions, we hope you respect ours too. We are entertainers after all! So if you're going to be butt-hurt by our videos, simply click X :/ But for those who share our sense of humour, enjoy and watch on! Comment below with what you want to see next! :) Thank you!