Some excerpts from U.S Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s Recent Speech:
“We have to draw common lines in the sand that cannot be washed away by the CCP’s bargains or their blandishments. Indeed, this is what the United States did recently when we rejected China’s unlawful claims in the South China Sea once and for all, as we have urged countries to become Clean Countries so that their citizens’ private information doesn’t end up in the hand of the Chinese Communist Party. We did it by setting standards.”
..
“Now, it’s true, it’s difficult. It’s difficult for some small countries. They fear being picked off. Some of them for that reason simply don’t have the ability, the courage to stand with us for the moment.”
..
“Indeed, we have a NATO ally of ours that hasn’t stood up in the way that it needs to with respect to Hong Kong because they fear Beijing will restrict access to China’s market. This is the kind of timidity that will lead to historic failure, and we can’t repeat it.”
..
“We cannot repeat the mistakes of these past years. The challenge of China demands exertion, energy from democracies – those in Europe, those in Africa, those in South America, and especially those in the Indo-Pacific region.”
------------
These can be seen as important policy recommendations for "setting standards" and urging "relevant countries to become clean countries." This is especially important for those that want to align with the democratic alliance by showing engagement with clearer norms for policy and standard setting. This is also an important reminder for manufacturers, producers, and R&D centers in the private sector.
If China does not change, it will be encircled. If Taiwan does not join, it will fall out of the team of like minded democracies.
This is also in line with Taiwan’s national interests. Our commercial interests, intellectual property rights, and brain drain will have a greater mechanism to regulate, instead of having to solely face the world’s second largest power, China, led by the CCP, on its own.
Let’s take a look at the most recent important news:
Huawei is banned while TSMC's global revenue grows against the trend (BBC)
ADB estimates Taiwan’s economic growth in 2020, the best four Asian dragons (Central News Agency)
Taiwan's next project is to establish a strong consensus on external threats so that domestic policies can be discussed more. This positive cycle will make the country better.
In other words, I sincerely believe that there is no need to ridicule any political party's past stance on China because the international situation has completely changed after the Hong Kong incident and the COVID19 epidemic. This is an opportunity given to us by history. However, if the opportunity is not grasped, these parties may be abandoned by the current historical moment and overall public opinion.
Once again, such a democratic country will be stronger by establishing a strong consensus on external threats and opening up debates for domestic policies.
This kind of strengthened democracy will bring us closer with like minded countries.
https://www.state.gov/communist-china-and-the-free-worlds-future/
美國國務卿蓬佩奧20多分的演說。
「我們必須劃定不會被中共的討價還價或他們的花言巧語所侵蝕的共同界線...而且我們還敦促有關國家成為潔淨國家(Clean Countries)以使他們的公民的私人信息不會落入中國共產黨的手中。」
.
「我們是通過設定標準來做到的。」
.
「是的,這是難以做到的。這對於一些小國而言是難以做到的。他們害怕遭到逐一封殺。有些國家正是出於這個原因而根本就沒有能力,沒有勇氣在此時此刻同我們站在一起。的確,我們的一個北約盟國在香港問題上沒有以其應有的方式挺身而出,因為他們害怕北京會限制他們進入中國市場。」
「這種怯懦將導致歷史性失敗,而我們不能重蹈覆轍。」
「我們不能再犯過去這些年的錯誤。中國構成的挑戰要求民主國家——歐洲、非洲、南美洲、特別是印度-太平洋(Indo-Pacific)地區的民主國家——付出努力和精力。」
節錄的這幾段,來自國務卿。作為重要的政策宣示,對於「設定標準」,敦促「有關國家成為潔淨國家」,還有民主同盟等,都在在顯示從戰略到戰術的政策設定,規格標準設定,都會有更明確的規範。對於製造商、生產端,研發商,都是重要的提示。
中國不改變,就會遇到圍堵。台灣不加入,就會落隊。
這也符合台灣的國家利益,我們的商業利益,智慧產權,人才流失,將會有更大的機制去調控,而不用孤獨面對世界第二強權,由中共領導的中國。
我們來看看最近的重要新聞:
華為被禁同時 台積電全球營收逆勢成長(BBC)
亞銀估2020台灣經濟成長 亞洲四小龍最佳(中央社)
台灣接下來的工程,就是對外威脅建立堅強共識,但是對內政策,可以更多更多元的討論,這一種正向的循環,會讓這個國家更好。
換言之,我真心認為不需訕笑任何政黨過去對中國立場 ; 因為國際情勢在香港事件、COVID19疫情之後是徹底變化,這是歷史給予我們的契機。但若不能掌握契機,那這些政黨可能就會被時代、主體民意給拋棄。
再強調一次,對外威脅建立堅強共識,對內政策開啟多元競爭,這樣的民主國家,會更強健。
這樣的民主同盟,會更緊密。
照片來源:美國國務院官方照
「historic moment or historical moment」的推薦目錄:
- 關於historic moment or historical moment 在 陳冠廷 Kuan-Ting Chen Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於historic moment or historical moment 在 英文多一點 A Little More English Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於historic moment or historical moment 在 Lee Hsien Loong Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於historic moment or historical moment 在 Look Closer: A Historic Moment for Monticello - YouTube 的評價
- 關於historic moment or historical moment 在 87 Must-See Historic Moments In Photographs 的評價
historic moment or historical moment 在 英文多一點 A Little More English Facebook 的最佳解答
#英文學習必知
大家都知道歷史的英文是history, 那形容詞有兩個:historical和historic,到底哪裡不一樣呢?
*historic 有歷史重要性的;具歷史意義的
e.g.
historic site/building 古蹟
historic occasion 歷史性場合
historic moment 歷史性的一刻
historic event 歷史事件.
historic significance 歷史意義
historic book 有歷史意義的書籍
- The British Consulate at Takow is a famous historic site in Kaohsiung. 英國打狗領事館是高雄著名的古蹟。
*historical 跟過去研究有關的;呈現過去事物的
e.g.
historical fiction/novel 歷史小說 (內容是發生在過去)
historical document 過去的文件
historical enmity 過去的仇恨
historical background 過去的背景
historical record/account 歷史紀錄
historical drama 古裝劇/歷史劇
- Empresses in the Palace is a popular historical drama in the Greater China Region. 《後宮甄嬛傳》是一部在大中華地區很受歡迎的古裝劇。
----Learn More----
延伸觀賞'A historic event' or 'an historic event'? by Oxford Dictionary
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__MY2HMMfyc
圖片來源:公有領域 Public Domain https://goo.gl/R1LD02
historic moment or historical moment 在 Lee Hsien Loong Facebook 的最佳貼文
The UN climate change talks in Paris (the 21st Conference of the Parties, or COP 21) ended successfully yesterday. The Paris Agreement is a historic deal, decades in the making. More than 190 countries have agreed to work together to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and limit global warming.
My thanks to Minister Vivian Balakrishnan (who saw this through previously as Environment Minister, and now Foreign Minister), our officers across many ministries and agencies for their hard work and close teamwork, and groups and individuals in Singapore who have given their support to this important issue.
Each of us must play our part, to make personal choices that protect the environment. Reduce, Recycle, Reuse. Let us work together to ensure the future of our planet for our children and generations to come. – LHL
#COP21
#ParisAgreement
Very happy that we have successfully clinched the Paris Agreement. Our long negotiations that took many days and nights over many years have finally borne fruit!
Singapore supports the agreement. What all Parties have achieved is a historic, global agreement which strikes the right balance between developed and developing Parties, the right balance between mitigation and adaptation, and the right balance between means of implementation and ambition. And as a result, the world is placed on a better trajectory to deal with the challenges of climate change, which affects all of us.
You can read my statement at the Committee of Paris to welcome the Paris Agreement below. You can also find the full Paris Agreement at this URL: unfccc.int/negotiation_updates
#COP21 #UNFCCC #ClimateChange #ParisAgreement
===
President of COP, Minister Laurent Fabius
Executive Secretary Christiana Figueres
Thank you, France.
The Republic of Singapore – we are a tiny island, one degree north of the equator, one quarter of our land is reclaimed from the sea. So on behalf of my people, we express our deepest appreciation for your outstanding efforts at arriving at this historic Paris Agreement. And needless to say, we fully support this historic agreement.
Many of you have said that this is not a perfect agreement. But Voltaire – a French Enlightenment philosopher – was supposed to have quoted a wise Italian who said that “Perfect is the enemy of Good’. And so we don’t have a perfect agreement but we have a good and necessary agreement. This historic agreement sets us on a collective journey for climate safety.
We do not live in a perfect world. If this was a perfect world, the problem would have been solved many decades ago. The Kyoto Protocol was paved with good intentions, and high ambition and it was legally binding, but yet it was also fatally flawed because of the lack of universal participation.
This is why Singapore has always emphasised the need for a comprehensive, rules-based, legally binding agreement applicable to all. Without universal participation, we will fail the future generations.
But the key hurdle has always been differentiation. The challenge has always been how to create a fair system – a fair system that recognises the inequalities of the past, the diversity of the present, and the uncertainties of the future. In particular, the developed countries with historical responsibilities have to be seen to be fulfilling their prior commitments and to continue to take the lead. Without this reassurance, there would have been insufficient strategic trust for the rest of the world, the developing country Parties, to raise our ambition at great cost to ourselves.
At its core, differentiation is really about fairness. We all want to be treated fairly, but sometimes the perception of fairness is subjective. Hence there needs to be reassurance to all Parties that this agreement accounts for the past and looks towards the future. A fair deal that recognises the great diversity of our respective national circumstances. Developed countries have argued that we need to be focused on the present and the future. We agree. But developing countries also point out that the present is a function of the past and that the future is not a given.
I believe the current agreement strikes the right balance between the developed countries and the developing Parties, the right balance between mitigation and adaptation, the right balance between means of implementation and ambition.
The second core issue that Singapore focussed on was transparency. Our Chief Negotiator Mr Kwok Fook Seng exercised great effort and imagination to help refine the text for Article 13. We need transparency in order for us to build mutual trust and confidence within the structure of this agreement. Good transparency rules hold us accountable to each other. It helps demonstrate that we will do what we say.
But there is actually another more important reason for transparency. And that is that our own citizens demand that. We need to account to our own citizens back home. They want to see that we are going to do everything it takes to deal with the challenge of climate change. And transparency keeps us accountable not just to each other as Parties but to our own people whom we represent here, and it helps us to collectively move forward with confidence.
Finally, as a member of AOSIS, let me express our appreciation to all the Parties for taking into account the special circumstances of the most vulnerable low-lying island states. The commitment to hold the ‘increase in the global average temperature to well below 2 ºC’ and to ‘pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 ºC’ will give us, all the islands, some reassurance. My brothers and sisters in AOSIS will also appreciate the mechanism for ‘loss and damage’.
Mr President, on behalf of all the citizens of Singapore, it is my honour to thank you. It is not often in the lives of politicians, diplomats or [members of] civil society to be present at the genesis of a major earth-changing moment, and we have been blessed to be here, in Paris on the 12th of December 2015.
Thank you all very much.
historic moment or historical moment 在 87 Must-See Historic Moments In Photographs 的推薦與評價
The photograph precipitated a dramatic change in how we perceive history. Amazing old photos like these can make it seem like you were standing right there ... ... <看更多>
historic moment or historical moment 在 Look Closer: A Historic Moment for Monticello - YouTube 的推薦與評價
... History Project. Remarks and Panel Discussion featuring: - Leslie Greene Bowman, President, Thomas Jefferson Foundation - David M ... ... <看更多>