//An activist detained under Hong Kong’s national security law is planning to apply to the High Court to lift restrictions on the media’s reporting of her bail hearing on Wednesday.
In a message published on Tuesday, Gwyneth Ho argued that laws banning the media from reporting details of bail hearings failed to protect the interests of the accused. The press should be allowed to freely report what happened during those hearings, she said.
“After the defendants under the national security law were arrested and remanded in custody, the reporting restrictions on bail hearings have turned the process into a ‘black box’, and has created widespread fears in society,” she wrote.
“The public has no way of knowing the contents of the bail hearings under the national security law, especially the evidence used by the prosecutors and the courts’ assessment of the defendants.”
Ho is among 47 democracy figures charged with conspiracy to commit subversion, which carries a maximum sentence of life in prison. They are accused of plotting to subvert state power via an informal primary poll held last July. Only 13 of the 47 have been granted bail since early March.
After being detained for more than six months, Ho will make her bail application at the High Court on Wednesday morning.
She publicised her arguments a day in advance, saying the reporting restrictions set out under section 9P of the Criminal Procedure Ordinance were originally meant to ensure that defendants received a fair trial. The law limits media coverage of bail hearings to basic information such as the defendant’s name, the court’s decision and bail conditions.
Those regulations backfired because the lack of transparency had caused the public to doubt whether the national security law had been fairly implemented, Ho wrote, adding that Hong Kong society was worried about arbitrary arrests based on flimsy evidence.
“In reality, the reporting restrictions benefit the Department of Justice, as it no longer needs to publicly explain the basis of the charges and various political accusations,” she wrote.
“The restrictions have clearly contravened the principle of public justice, and if the courts still refuse to lift them, the public will inevitably suspect that the courts accept this unfair situation.”
The open administration of justice was a fundamental principle of Hong Kong’s common law system, and courts should be scrutinised by the public and the press, Ho said, quoting the city’s former chief justice Denys Roberts.
Hong Kong courts have mostly kept reporting restrictions in place for bail applications under the national security law, though some judges have issued written rulings explaining their decision to grant or refuse bail, which are typically published after a delay.
Earlier on Tuesday, the court again denied the bail application of former pro-democracy lawmaker Gary Fan, a co-defendant in the subversion case. Like most of the 47, Fan has been in custody for months with no trial date lined up as yet.
By Holmes Chan//
同時也有6部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過4萬的網紅Dd tai,也在其Youtube影片中提到,Adeste Fideles “O Come, All Ye Faithful” (originally written in Latin as Adeste Fideles) is a Christmas carol which has been attributed to various au...
「1 july march hong kong」的推薦目錄:
- 關於1 july march hong kong 在 Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於1 july march hong kong 在 馮智政 Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於1 july march hong kong 在 Roger Chung 鍾一諾 Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於1 july march hong kong 在 Dd tai Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於1 july march hong kong 在 Em Proving Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於1 july march hong kong 在 Healthy Brains Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於1 july march hong kong 在 1st July March Hong Kong - Pinterest 的評價
- 關於1 july march hong kong 在 July 1 march goes ahead despite controversy over protest route 的評價
- 關於1 july march hong kong 在 Time lapse of 2 million Hong Kong protesters | By 9GAG 的評價
1 july march hong kong 在 馮智政 Facebook 的最佳貼文
一路睇一路眼濕濕。不只對案,更是對吳靄儀半生追求法治的總結,很感動
//Your honour, the Hong Kong people is a peace-loving and well-disciplined people. Their resolute self-restraint even in highly emotional situations has been proved time and again. In the critical hours of the handover between 30 June and I July 1997, the great event passed without a hitch. In the march of half a million on 1 July 2003, not a single pane of glass was broken, Even in 2019, when over I million marched on 9 June, and over 2 million marched on 16 June. The pence and good order of the massive crowds astonished and won the admiration of the world.
And in the incident of the present trial, this was demonstrated again. By the estimation of the organizers, over 1.7 million participated in the day's event. But whatever the exact figure, the huge and dense crowds in and around the venue, the resolute patience with which the crowds waited in the pouring rain, were captured in undisputed footages preserved for all posterity. The number and the perseverance spoke volumes for the intensity of the feelings in the community, and yet the self-restraint was for all to see. It is not disputed even by the prosecution that the event was entirely peaceful and orderly, without any untoward event. The crowd had kept faith with the organizers who enjoined them to be "peaceful, rational and non-violent". At such times we cannot be seen to abandon the people but must stand side by side with them, in the hope that peace may prevail.
The positive effect of the peacefulness of that demonstration was acknowledged by the CE, Mrs Carrie Lam 2 days later, remarking that it would facilitate dialogue between government and the public. In the event, the dialogue on that occasion did not continue for long, but it was a step in the right direction. I believe we should nurture hope, and continue, as Justice Kennedy urged upon the legal profession gathered together in that distinguished company: You must speak reason to your litigants. You must speak justice to society. You must speak truth to power.
Your honour, I came late to the law, I have grown old in the service of the rule of law, I understand Sir Thomas More is the patron saint of the legal profession, He was tried for treason because he would not bend the law to the King's will. His famous last words were well authenticated. I beg to slightly adapt and adopt them: I stand the law's good servant but the people's first. For the law must serve the people, not the people the law.
Your honour, please permit me to thank my counsel. Their tireless dedication and excellence have made me proud to be a member of the bar.
This is my statement. Thank you, your honour.
Dated the 16th Day of April, 2021//
https://www.thestandnews.com/politics/%E8%8B%B1%E6%96%87%E5%85%A8%E6%96%87-8-18-%E7%B6%AD%E5%9C%92%E9%9B%86%E6%9C%83%E6%A1%88-%E5%90%B3%E9%9D%84%E5%84%80%E8%A6%AA%E8%87%AA%E9%99%B3%E8%A9%9E-%E6%B3%95%E5%BE%8B%E6%87%89%E6%9C%8D%E5%8B%99%E4%BA%BA%E6%B0%91-%E8%80%8C%E9%9D%9E%E7%9B%B8%E5%8F%8D/?fbclid=IwAR2AowqmPkc7odRJ26eEULTd69_5_AbtP3Je5aXQewwXxkU2gYazWsuvnW0
1 july march hong kong 在 Roger Chung 鍾一諾 Facebook 的精選貼文
今早為Asian Medical Students Association Hong Kong (AMSAHK)的新一屆執行委員會就職典禮作致詞分享嘉賓,題目為「疫情中的健康不公平」。
感謝他們的熱情款待以及為整段致詞拍了影片。以下我附上致詞的英文原稿:
It's been my honor to be invited to give the closing remarks for the Inauguration Ceremony for the incoming executive committee of the Asian Medical Students' Association Hong Kong (AMSAHK) this morning. A video has been taken for the remarks I made regarding health inequalities during the COVID-19 pandemic (big thanks to the student who withstood the soreness of her arm for holding the camera up for 15 minutes straight), and here's the transcript of the main body of the speech that goes with this video:
//The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, continues to be rampant around the world since early 2020, resulting in more than 55 million cases and 1.3 million deaths worldwide as of today. (So no! It’s not a hoax for those conspiracy theorists out there!) A higher rate of incidence and deaths, as well as worse health-related quality of life have been widely observed in the socially disadvantaged groups, including people of lower socioeconomic position, older persons, migrants, ethnic minority and communities of color, etc. While epidemiologists and scientists around the world are dedicated in gathering scientific evidence on the specific causes and determinants of the health inequalities observed in different countries and regions, we can apply the Social Determinants of Health Conceptual Framework developed by the World Health Organization team led by the eminent Prof Sir Michael Marmot, world’s leading social epidemiologist, to understand and delineate these social determinants of health inequalities related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
According to this framework, social determinants of health can be largely categorized into two types – 1) the lower stream, intermediary determinants, and 2) the upper stream, structural and macro-environmental determinants. For the COVID-19 pandemic, we realized that the lower stream factors may include material circumstances, such as people’s living and working conditions. For instance, the nature of the occupations of these people of lower socioeconomic position tends to require them to travel outside to work, i.e., they cannot work from home, which is a luxury for people who can afford to do it. This lack of choice in the location of occupation may expose them to greater risk of infection through more transportation and interactions with strangers. We have also seen infection clusters among crowded places like elderly homes, public housing estates, and boarding houses for foreign domestic helpers. Moreover, these socially disadvantaged people tend to have lower financial and social capital – it can be observed that they were more likely to be deprived of personal protective equipment like face masks and hand sanitizers, especially during the earlier days of the pandemic. On the other hand, the upper stream, structural determinants of health may include policies related to public health, education, macroeconomics, social protection and welfare, as well as our governance… and last, but not least, our culture and values. If the socioeconomic and political contexts are not favorable to the socially disadvantaged, their health and well-being will be disproportionately affected by the pandemic. Therefore, if we, as a society, espouse to address and reduce the problem of health inequalities, social determinants of health cannot be overlooked in devising and designing any public health-related strategies, measures and policies.
Although a higher rate of incidence and deaths have been widely observed in the socially disadvantaged groups, especially in countries with severe COVID-19 outbreaks, this phenomenon seems to be less discussed and less covered by media in Hong Kong, where the disease incidence is relatively low when compared with other countries around the world. Before the resurgence of local cases in early July, local spread of COVID-19 was sporadic and most cases were imported. In the earlier days of the pandemic, most cases were primarily imported by travelers and return-students studying overseas, leading to a minor surge between mid-March and mid-April of 874 new cases. Most of these cases during Spring were people who could afford to travel and study abroad, and thus tended to be more well-off. Therefore, some would say the expected social gradient in health impact did not seem to exist in Hong Kong, but may I remind you that, it is only the case when we focus on COVID-19-specific incidence and mortality alone. But can we really deduce from this that COVID-19-related health inequality does not exist in Hong Kong? According to the Social Determinants of Health Framework mentioned earlier, the obvious answer is “No, of course not.” And here’s why…
In addition to the direct disease burden, the COVID-19 outbreak and its associated containment measures (such as economic lockdown, mandatory social distancing, and change of work arrangements) could have unequal wider socioeconomic impacts on the general population, especially in regions with pervasive existing social inequalities. Given the limited resources and capacity of the socioeconomically disadvantaged to respond to emergency and adverse events, their general health and well-being are likely to be unduly and inordinately affected by the abrupt changes in their daily economic and social conditions, like job loss and insecurity, brought about by the COVID-19 outbreak and the corresponding containment and mitigation measures of which the main purpose was supposedly disease prevention and health protection at the first place. As such, focusing only on COVID-19 incidence or mortality as the outcomes of concern to address health inequalities may leave out important aspects of life that contributes significantly to people’s health. Recently, my research team and I collaborated with Sir Michael Marmot in a Hong Kong study, and found that the poor people in Hong Kong fared worse in every aspects of life than their richer counterparts in terms of economic activity, personal protective equipment, personal hygiene practice, as well as well-being and health after the COVID-19 outbreak. We also found that part of the observed health inequality can be attributed to the pandemic and its related containment measures via people’s concerns over their own and their families’ livelihood and economic activity. In other words, health inequalities were contributed by the pandemic even in a city where incidence is relatively low through other social determinants of health that directly concerned the livelihood and economic activity of the people. So in this study, we confirmed that focusing only on the incident and death cases as the outcomes of concern to address health inequalities is like a story half-told, and would severely truncate and distort the reality.
Truth be told, health inequality does not only appear after the pandemic outbreak of COVID-19, it is a pre-existing condition in countries and regions around the world, including Hong Kong. My research over the years have consistently shown that people in lower socioeconomic position tend to have worse physical and mental health status. Nevertheless, precisely because health inequality is nothing new, there are always voices in our society trying to dismiss the problem, arguing that it is only natural to have wealth inequality in any capitalistic society. However, in reckoning with health inequalities, we need to go beyond just figuring out the disparities or differences in health status between the poor and the rich, and we need to raise an ethically relevant question: are these inequalities, disparities and differences remediable? Can they be fixed? Can we do something about them? If they are remediable, and we can do something about them but we haven’t, then we’d say these inequalities are ultimately unjust and unfair. In other words, a society that prides itself in pursuing justice must, and I say must, strive to address and reduce these unfair health inequalities. Borrowing the words from famed sociologist Judith Butler, “the virus alone does not discriminate,” but “social and economic inequality will make sure that it does.” With COVID-19, we learn that it is not only the individuals who are sick, but our society. And it’s time we do something about it.
Thank you very much!//
Please join me in congratulating the incoming executive committee of AMSAHK and giving them the best wishes for their future endeavor!
Roger Chung, PhD
Assistant Professor, CUHK JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, @CUHK Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong 香港中文大學 - CUHK
Associate Director, CUHK Institute of Health Equity
1 july march hong kong 在 Dd tai Youtube 的最佳貼文
Adeste Fideles
“O Come, All Ye Faithful” (originally written in Latin as Adeste Fideles) is a Christmas carol which has been attributed to various authors, including John Francis Wade (1711–1786), with the earliest copies of the hymn all bearing his signature, John Reading (1645–1692) and King John IV of Portugal (1604–1656).
The original four verses of the hymn were extended to a total of eight, and these have been translated into many languages. The English translation of “O Come, All Ye Faithful” by the English Catholic priest Frederick Oakeley, written in 1841, is widespread in most English speaking countries. The present harmonization is from the English Hymnal (1906).
O Tannenbaum:
It is a German Christmas song. Based on a traditional folk song, it became associated with the Christmas tree by the early 20th century and sung as a Christmas carol.
Jingle Bells:
One of the best-known and commonly sung American Christmas songs in the world. It was written by James Lord Pierpont (1822–1893) and published under the title “One Horse Open Sleigh” in the autumn of 1857.
White Christmas
It is an Irving Berlin song reminiscing about an old-fashioned Christmas setting. According to the Guinness World Records, the version sung by Bing Crosby is the best-selling single of all time, with estimated sales in excess of 50 million copies worldwide.
Winter Wonderland
Silent Night
“Silent Night” (German: Stille Nacht, heilige Nacht) is a popular Christmas carol, composed in 1818 by Franz Xaver Gruber to lyrics by Joseph Mohr in the small town of Oberndorf bei Salzburg, Austria. It was declared an intangible cultural heritage by UNESCO in March 2011.
Sleigh Ride:
It is a popular light orchestral piece composed by Leroy Anderson. The composer had the original idea for the piece during a heat wave in July 1946; he finished the work in February 1948. Though it was originally an instrumental piece, lyrics, about a person who would like to ride in a sleigh on a winter’s day with another person, were written by Mitchell Parish in 1950.
類別
娛樂
這部影片中的配樂
瞭解詳情
立即訂閱 YouTube Premium,享受沒有廣告干擾的音樂饗宴
歌曲
White Christmas
演出者
José Carreras;Plácido Domingo;Luciano Pavarotti
Writers
Irving Berlin
授權 YouTube 的內容擁有者:
SME (代表Sony Classical); UMPI, UMPG Publishing, UNIAO BRASILEIRA DE EDITORAS DE MUSICA - UBEM, ASCAP, BMG Rights Management, LatinAutor, LatinAutor - UMPG, Concord Music Publishing與 9 個音樂版權協會
歌曲
Let It Snow
演出者
José Carreras;Plácido Domingo;Luciano Pavarotti
Writers
Sammy Cahn, Jule Styne
授權 YouTube 的內容擁有者:
SME (代表Sony Classical); UNIAO BRASILEIRA DE EDITORAS DE MUSICA - UBEM, UMPG Publishing, CMRRA, PEDL, Concord Music Publishing, LatinAutor - Warner Chappell, Warner Chappell, BMG Rights Management, LatinAutor, UMPI, ARESA與 13 個音樂版權協會
歌曲
O Tannenbaum
演出者
José Carreras;Plácido Domingo;Luciano Pavarotti
授權 YouTube 的內容擁有者:
SME (代表Sony Classical); Sony ATV Publishing, UMPG Publishing, SODRAC, UMPI與 18 個音樂版權協會
歌曲
Carol of the Drum (The Little Drummer Boy)
演出者
José Carreras;Plácido Domingo
Writers
Katherine Davis
授權 YouTube 的內容擁有者:
SME (代表Sony Classical); UMPI, Sony ATV Publishing, PEDL, LatinAutor, CMRRA, UNIAO BRASILEIRA DE EDITORAS DE MUSICA - UBEM, EMI Music Publishing, LatinAutor - Warner Chappell與 6 個音樂版權協會
歌曲
Jingle Bells
演出者
José Carreras, Plácido Domingo, Luciano Pavarotti
專輯
Christmas All Over The World
Writers
Frank Farian
授權 YouTube 的內容擁有者:
SME (代表Sony Classical); SODRAC, PEDL, UMPG Publishing, Sony ATV Publishing, Public Domain Compositions與 11 個音樂版權協會
歌曲
Adeste Fideles
演出者
José Carreras;Luciano Pavarotti
授權 YouTube 的內容擁有者:
SME (代表Sony Classical); Public Domain Compositions, LatinAutor - UMPG, SODRAC, LatinAutor, UNIAO BRASILEIRA DE EDITORAS DE MUSICA - UBEM, Sony ATV Publishing與 11 個音樂版權協會
歌曲
Cantique de nöel (O Holy Night)
演出者
Plácido Domingo;Luciano Pavarotti
授權 YouTube 的內容擁有者:
SME (代表Sony Classical); EMI Music Publishing, Sony ATV Publishing, SODRAC, ASCAP, Public Domain Compositions與 14 個音樂版權協會
歌曲
Amazing Grace
演出者
José Carreras;Plácido Domingo;Luciano Pavarotti
授權 YouTube 的內容擁有者:
SME (代表Sony Classical); LatinAutor, EMI Music Publishing, ASCAP, Public Domain Compositions, LatinAutor - SonyATV, UMPI與 15 個音樂版權協會
歌曲
Winter Wonderland
演出者
José Carreras;Plácido Domingo;Luciano Pavarotti
授權 YouTube 的內容擁有者:
SME (代表Sony Classical); LatinAutor, LatinAutor - Warner Chappell, PEDL, EMI Music Publishing, Sony ATV Publishing, UNIAO BRASILEIRA DE EDITORAS DE MUSICA - UBEM, AMRA, Warner Chappell與 11 個音樂版權協會
歌曲
Sleigh Ride
演出者
José Carreras;Plácido Domingo;Luciano Pavarotti
Writers
Anderson Leroy, Mitchell Parish
授權 YouTube 的內容擁有者:
SME (代表Sony Classical); LatinAutor - SonyATV, Warner Chappell, EMI Music Publishing, SOLAR Music Rights Management, LatinAutor, CMRRA, UNIAO BRASILEIRA DE EDITORAS DE MUSICA - UBEM與 6 個音樂版權協會
1 july march hong kong 在 Em Proving Youtube 的精選貼文
Hello大家好, 我是EM!
不行不行…
這2個月真的有點買瘋了的感覺
還有已經在IG跟FB跟大家分享的沒有放在裡面再講
要好好節制一下了
話說自從拍了影片後我就停不下來一直買文具…
這病可以醫治的嗎?
我IG和FB專頁會不定時上傳各種跟手帳和文具有關的照片,
記得也要追蹤喔!
我還小試牛刀的做了一個個人網站,
有興趣的朋友也可以上去看看
Instagram : em.proving
https://www.instagram.com/em.proving/
FB專頁:EM
https://www.facebook.com/em.proving/
個人網站
https://emprovingem.wixsite.com/drawing
----------------------------------------------------------
影片中提及的文具店 :
Stationary mentioned in the vedio :
-淘寶
-【離形紙100張】CNY$13.9
https://goo.gl/LMsNEN
-墊腳石
-【大人Beauty in mind資料夾A4 亭亭】NTD$120
-【CARL兩孔打孔機】NTD$178
-【Pilot Juice Up 白】NTD$32
-【UNI 0.7鋼珠筆 白】NTD$27
-【Mia狗跑貓跳MT】NTD$48
-【汪旺星球 可愛無敵貼紙 40入】NTD$40
-香港MTOhttps://www.facebook.com/maskingtapeonly
-【喵星人手帳 https://goo.gl/poZVqV】
-【黑璐璐-Belu https://goo.gl/um93sJ】
-【Zooorigami Cut And Paste https://goo.gl/Qs4uD3】
-【Yobe企鵝 https://goo.gl/W4q1z2】
-香港西九龍中心 蘋果商場
-【$1紙膠帶分裝】HKD$1
-【其一文創 磚瓦】HKD$19
-【其一文創 水彩顏料】HKD$38
九乘九
-【輝柏油性色鉛筆】NTD$49
-【32K筆記本】NTD$19
-【Amifa便條貼】NTD$38
-【百老繪 職業人生貼紙】
-【米蒂的冒險 貼紙】NTD$26
光南
-【PLUS花邊帶 逛街小熊】NTD$39
-【利百代印台 黑】
-【新力牌日付印 英文五號】
-【伊東屋彩虹鉛筆】
----------------------------------------------------------
推薦影片:
Recommand video:
我的軟頭筆收藏 My Brush Pen Collection
https://youtu.be/c-jGY2IeozU
跟我一起學英文軟筆書法(一)基礎篇 How I learn Brush Lettering
https://youtu.be/o9-RJ8iqi8o
跟我一起設計2018年子彈手帳筆記 Plan With Me 2018 Bullet Journal Setup
https://youtu.be/RepTCv_t_mU
跟我一起設計七月子彈手帳日記 Plan With Me July 2018 Bullet Journal
https://youtu.be/Q7z5DXKdM9s
台灣九乘九文具專家購物分享│Taiwan Stationery Haul
https://youtu.be/C5klbMi-lpU
----------------------------------------------------------
EM的關鍵字
台灣/香港/文具/手帳/子彈筆記/文具分享/繪畫/畫畫/插圖/文具Haul
----------------------------------------------------------
合作聯絡 :
E-mail - [email protected]
1 july march hong kong 在 Healthy Brains Youtube 的最佳貼文
BGM: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVhcY...
-------------------------------------
Lyrics: Yi Yan
Hey girl
Wanna tell you that I’m coming from Hong Kong
Writing you this song
Trust me you will never get wrong
I am so damn romantic
as long as you love titanic
You say love is ironic
I say love is fucking dramatic
Gonna give you ten out of ten
My name is not Ken but you can call me yiyan
We run the world like a motherfking hk gang
Baby girl you know that my life is not making sense
Yeah
We’re running playing chilling smoking party everyday
We’re making bigger flying higher richer everyday
Gonna fly from Mong Kok till we hit the California Bay
No matter now is March july or decemeber and may ay ay
You might wanna say
you might wanna say
you might wanna say
you might wanna say
you might wanna say
you might wanna say
1 july march hong kong 在 July 1 march goes ahead despite controversy over protest route 的推薦與評價
Hong Kong : July 1 march goes ahead despite controversy over ... Protesters urged the government to uphold 'One Country, Two Systems'. ... <看更多>
1 july march hong kong 在 Time lapse of 2 million Hong Kong protesters | By 9GAG 的推薦與評價
The power of the people - 2 million HongKongers ( 1 /4 of the city population) showed up to the march on June 16 for keeping their rights. ... <看更多>
1 july march hong kong 在 1st July March Hong Kong - Pinterest 的推薦與評價
Sep 8, 2019 - No China Extradition! Free Hong Kong! 香港加油!撤回送中條例!守護香港! ... <看更多>