(English below)
#太陽花學運 邁入7週年之際,鬼島之音希望能盡一份力,在社群上再次推,《 太陽・不遠 Sunflower Occupation 》紀錄片,重溫十個導演串起的九個主題。整部片子搭配雙語字幕,非常適合海外人士觀賞。紀錄片探討的是,在長達 24 天的占領國會運動中,青年如何被改變? 24 天後他們又改變了什麼?完整影片:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLs3tDb1WiI
.
我們在 #紀念太陽花7週年 同時,也希望能了解當時的學運代表及眾多參與者在學運經過 2,500 多天後的改變及看法。 #GIM318
.
🌻 #林飛帆 是太陽花學運主要學生領袖之一,現任 民進黨副秘書長,他的身影多次出現在紀錄片《太陽‧不遠》裡。
.
🌻 NGO 界的生力軍 #潘儀,參與過的議題領域包括實驗教育、#廢死、#LGBTQ、 #時代力量等等。現在負責 #國際人權聯盟 的東亞區事務。她出現在《太陽 ‧ 不遠》的第七部紀錄短片:#李家驊 導演的《看不見太陽的那幾天》
.
🌻 #陳為廷 出現在《太陽‧不遠》的第一部紀錄短片:#傅榆 導演的《不小心變成總指揮》。他在 2014 年成為太陽花學運的代表人物之一。目前正在美國塔夫茨大學的弗萊徹法律與外交關係學院,就讀外交政策和國際經濟法。
.
🌻 #謝昇佑 老師所參與的社會運動從2010年的 #野草莓 一路到了2014的 #三一八運動。身兼創業家的他,現在在新創公司「 好食機 」為小型食農生產者進行輔導和培力工作。謝昇佑出現於《太陽 ‧ 不遠》的第八部紀錄短片:#李惠仁 導演的《烈焰下的崩解與重生》
.
🌻 #邱琦欣 雖然未在《太陽 ‧ 不遠》裡頭現身,但他也全程參與318的陳抗之中,如今成為英語網路上最積極為台灣左派政治發聲的人員之一。
.
最後,大家可以向身邊講英文的朋友介紹「#破曉計畫」:一個收納了關於三一八運動各種資訊的網路百科,被 g0v.tw 台灣零時政府 譽為:「臺灣太陽花運動最全面的資料庫」
-----------------
🌻 Sunflower Movement - 7 Years Later 🌻
To mark this pivotal event in Taiwan’s recent history, we looked up some of the student activists from 2014.
On March 18, 2014, student activists occupied Taiwan’s parliament demanding the withdrawal of a trade pact with China. For the next 24 days, 400 protesters camped inside while 10,000 more surrounded the area. Among them were documentary filmmakers. The result was “Sunflower Occupation" - a 120min documentary featuring 9 activists + their days inside. The film crowdfunded $2.5M NTD in just four days. It was released by October 2014, in just 6 months.
Here’s the full film, with English subtitles! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLs3tDb1WiI
“Sunflower Occupation” was produced by Taipei Documentary Filmmakers’ Union. It screened at multiple film festivals in Taiwan and Hong Kong in 2014 and 2015. Today, we looked up some of the activists featured.
🌻 Fei-fan LIN emerged as a central figure of the Sunflower Movement. He appears throughout our recommended film, “Sunflower Occupation.” He is currently Deputy Secretary General of the Democratic Progressive Party.
🌻 Yi PAN is a new-gen force in Taiwan’s NGO scene. She’s worked on education, anti-death penalty, LGBTQ, New Power Taiwan, and more. She’s currently East Asia officer at the International Federation for Human Rights. She’s featured in the 7th segment of “Sunflower Occupation.”
🌻 Wei-ting CHEN appears in the 1st segment, titled “A Commander Made by Accident.” CHEN became one of faces of the Sunflower Movement in 2014. He’s currently pursuing a degree in foreign policy and international economic law at the The Fletcher School at Tufts University
🌻 Sheng-Yu HSIEH is an activist and social impact entrepreneur. He was also at the 2010 Wild Strawberry Movement and founded Howsfood to coach, empower, and boost small-scale farmers in rural Taiwan. Meet him in segment 8 of the documentary.
🌻 Brian HIOE does not appear in the 2014 documentary, but he was present and on-site from the very first day of the movement. He is now a prominent voice of Taiwan’s pro-democracy advocacy in the English language.
To round up our tribute to this pivotal event in contemporary Taiwan history, we recommend the Daybreak Project, an English-language archive and encyclopedia, which open-source movement g0v calls “The Most Complete Archive of Taiwan’s Sunflower Movement.” It is hosted by HIOE’s New Bloom Magazine.
.
.
#318學運 #反黑箱 #太陽不遠 #黑箱作業 #國家機器 #世代正義 #sunflowermovement #taiwanconsensus #學生運動 #馬英九 #學生抗爭 #sunfloweroccupation
同時也有1部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過35萬的網紅阿兜仔不教美語,也在其Youtube影片中提到,訂閱!(Subscribe! ) ▶ http://lnk.pics/csG 最新的影片(NEW VIDS!)▶ http://pics.ee/gTO 【小遊戲 MINI GAME】 1. 有打哪一個錯字(大的字幕)? 2. 這集出現哪一些『#』? 3. 有沒有人想要跟摩天輪結婚? 【簡介des...
社會運動english 在 無待堂 Facebook 的最佳貼文
❗️重要:電檢處告示並不代表導演團隊立場
《佔領立法會》及《理大圍城》遭電檢處多番為難❗️
(Please scroll down for English)
香港電影、報刊及物品管理處要求《佔領立法會》及《理大圍城》片首加上聲明,我們要澄清這聲明並非創作人的意願。
《佔領立法會》及《理大圍城》一直為外界爭議度非常高的電影,導演團隊一直為真實紀錄各社會運動而不惜冒著各種風險,電影帶來的回響及反應大家有目共睹。
但!
香港電影、報刊及物品管理處(簡稱電檢處)卻利用各種手段,逼使導演們需要作出非本人意願的聲明!如果不跟從指引,電檢處便可以利用行政手段令放映無法進行!
電檢處要求作出之聲明如下:
《佔領立法會》:
「影片紀錄2019年7月1日立法會綜合大樓受到示威衝擊的嚴重事件,當中有部分描述或行為,根據現行法例可能會構成刑事罪行。」
《理大圍城》:
「影片紀錄2019年11月在香港理工大學及周邊地點發生的嚴重事件,當中有部分描述或行為,根據現行法例可能會構成刑事罪行。此外,影片部分內容或評論亦可能未獲證實或有誤導成份。」
影意志表示強烈不滿電檢處以下行為:
1.以保障各方為由,實屬保障自己之實來強逼修改影片
2.要求影片開首作出聲明,但不願表明此為電檢處要求
3.以不知明原因推翻由電檢處發出的證明書
4.未能按時發出證明書,並將責任推卸於申請者
以下為影意志與電檢處之洽商經過:
7月中時,影意志為舊版本影片申請電檢證明書。
8月7日(國安法生效約一個月後)
影意志首次收到電檢處通知,表示需要在電影片頭加入由電檢處發出之警告字眼。影意志清楚表示此字句並不是出自導演團隊意願,並不會修改影片。電檢處表示,若不跟從指引,有機會令行政程序時間增加。
9月3日(國安法生效約兩個月後)
影意志重新遞交申請,並於新版本影片中加入電檢處要求之字句,及標明此字句為電檢處要求。
9月8日
影意志收到電檢處通知,表示影片開首有不屬於此影片之告示字眼,要求刪改。影意志表示此要求不合理,電檢處不能在未執行檢視工作前便要求申請者進行更改;但對方亦一貫作風,以會引致檢視工作延誤等為由而要求進行修改。
9月9日
影意志立即按電檢處要求遞交新版本。
9月15日
影意志致電查詢電檢進度,對方則回應未能於本星期批核證明書。影意志表明早於9月3日已遞交申請,理應9月17日收到證明書;電檢處解釋因為9月11日才正式收到更新版本影片,當作9月14日才正式開始工作,故最快只能於9月21日發出證明書。(影意志:申請表已列明9月3日為申請日期,但因為電檢處內部審查緩慢而將責任推卸。)
9月18日 下午6時40分 (辦公完結時間為下午6時)
電檢處通知影意志需在片頭加上其提供的告示字句,並於9月21日當日交回新版本,否則未能於放映當日發出證明書;影意志重新要求要標示電檢處是發出告示者,並且需於放映當日收到證明書。電檢處回覆,告示並不能標明是電檢處發出,並且只能按照他們要求作出更改。
同時,影意志被告知原有舊版本的電檢證明書不能使用,因為新舊版本不可同時擁有兩張證明書(影意志不明所以,但對方亦無法列出清晰原因)
9月21日
直到放映前兩小時,影意志才收到電檢處發出的證明書,而《理大圍城》被評為III級,需作出退票手續。為觀眾帶來不便,影意志深感抱歉。
影意志及香港紀錄片工作者不希望為業界帶來錯誤先例,但亦不想真相任由香港政府扼殺、及默許歷史被政權改寫!為了能順利放映,影意志暫時接受此條件,但一定會繼續上訴!請大家廣傳此消息!多謝大家一直支持香港電影;煩請以後看電影出現奇怪告示,請大家不要誤會導演們!
*註1:在香港舉行之所有公開放映,需獲得由香港電影、報刊及物品管理處發出的核准證明書,方可進行放映活動;否則,實屬違法。
__________
❗️Disclaimer: The opinion expressed in the statement issued by The Office for Film, Newspaper and Article Administration (OFNAA) does not reflect the views of the director and the production team.
The Tug of War with the OFNAA over “Taking back the Legislature" + "Inside the Red Brick Wall".
Although “Taking back the Legislature" and "Inside the Red Brick Wall" have not shied away from controversy, yet the production crew have always strived to objectively capture every social movement against all odds, and the films have received a wide swath of responses since their release.
Nevertheless, the OFNAA has gone out of their way to coerce the directors into making statements against their wills. When failed to oblige, they could face having their works barred from screening by the OFNAA with whatever administrative reasons they might come up with.
Therefore, Ying E Chi hereby express our strong discontent to the following actions of the OFNAA:
1. Force the films to be edited under the pretext of protecting everyone, but in fact, only to protect their own interest
2. Request an announcement to be made at the beginning of the film, yet refused to be declared as the one who demanded the announcement
3. Overturn the previous certificate issued by the OFNAA with unspecified reason
4. Fail to issue the certificate on time as promised, whilst shifting the responsibility to the applicant
The statement required by the OFNAA is as follows:
“Taking back the Legislature”:
“This film records the serious incident of the storming of the Legislative Council Complex on 1 July 2019. Some of those depictions or acts may constitute criminal offences under prevailing laws.”
“Inside the Red Brick Wall:
“This film records the serious incidents at The Hong Kong Polytechnic University and nearby areas in November 2019. Some of those depictions or acts may constitute criminal offences under prevailing laws. Some of the contents of or commentaries in the film may be unverified or misleading.”
Here is how the negotiation between Ying E Chi and the OFNAA unfolds:
Mid-July
Ying E Chi filed an application for a Certificate of Approval for the old version of “Taking back the Legislature" + "Inside the Red Brick Wall".
7/8/2020 (A month after the National Security Law was enacted)
The first time Ying E Chi were notified by the OFNAA that a warning issued by them must be added at the beginning of the film. Ying E Chi then categorically declared that since the content of the warning does not reflect the will of the director, the films will not be edited as a result. The OFNAA responded by saying the administrative procedure might be delayed if their instructions have not been followed.
3/9/2020 (About 2 months after the National Security Law was enacted)
Ying E Chi handed in the application again with a new version of the films including the warning statement as requested, indicating that the warning is issued by the OFNAA.
8/9/2020
Ying E Chi were informed by the OFNAA to remove the statement at the beginning of the film as it does not belong to the film. Ying E Chi responded by calling out the absurdity of such request, as the OFNAA ought not to ask the films to be edited before they even review the whole film. Yet again the OFNAA demanded the changes to be made since it might cause a delay in the reviewing process.
9/9/2020
As a result, Ying E Chi submitted a new version at the first instance at the request of the OFNAA.
15/9/2020
Ying E Chi phoned in to enquire about the application procedure, since the application was made on the 3 Sep, so the Certificate of Approval should be issued on 17 Sep. However, the OFNAA replied that the Certificate of Approval would in fact not be granted this week for they claimed to have received the updated version on 11 Sep, so they could only have begun the reviewing process officially on the 14th, and thus the earliest time the certificate could be issued would be 21 Sep. (Note: Despite the official application date listed on the application form was 3 Sep, the OFNAA still tried to avoid the responsibility caused by their sluggish bureaucratic process.
18/9/2020 6.40pm (Office Hour ends at 6pm)
The OFNAA informed Ying E Chi that a statement PROVIDED by them must be included at the start of the film, and the new version must be handed in on 21 Sep, otherwise the Certificate of Approval would not be issued on the day of the screening. Ying E Chi again requested to indicate the OFNAA as the one who issued the statement, and that the certificate should be granted on screening day. The OFNAA, however, rejected to be identified as the one who issued such a statement, and insisted that all amendments can only be made subject to their approvals and requirements. At the time, Ying E Chi were informed that the Certificate of Approval obtained for the old version of “ Taking back the Legislature" + "Inside the Red Brick Wall" could no longer be used, as there cannot be two certificates for both old version and the updated version. (Ying E Chi, are deeply confounded by this sudden decision, but the OFNAA has failed to offer any clarifications.)
21/9/2020
Not only have Ying E Chi just received the certificate on the day of the screening from OFNAA, but at the same time we have been notified that "Inside the Red Brick Wall” has been classified as a Category III Film, and therefore need to make the refund arrangements.
We are profoundly sorry about the inconvenience caused.
It is not the wish of Ying E Chi and Hong Kong Documentary Filmmakers to set the wrong example for the industry, yet we would hate to have the truth to be buried by the Hong Kong Government or to let those in power rewrite the history. Ying E Chi have compromised for this instance in order to facilitate this screening, we, nevertheless, will keep on protesting, so please spread the words and make our story known. Thank you for continuing to support Hong Kong films, and from now on please do not be misled by any bizarre statements in movies and misunderstand the directors.
*Note: Under the Film Censorship Ordinance (Cap 392), a film intended for exhibition in Hong Kong at any public place has to be submitted to the Office for Film, Newspaper and Article Administration for prior approval. Failing to comply with such requirement may constitute a criminal offence.
社會運動english 在 潘小濤 Facebook 的精選貼文
(轉)
各位兄弟姊妹,據悉「藍絲」陣營,向香港天主教教區實名投訴轄下正義和平委員會發表《抗議警方利用疫情濫權濫捕》和《譴責李慧琼議會暴力》聲明,更指兩篇聲明「不是社會主流」。
香港天主教正義和平委員會一直堅守信仰精神,為弱小發聲,例如協助因參與社會運動而囚禁的手足走出困境、聲援中國地下教會等。近年,社會白熱化,敢言的教會團體受到滋擾,甚至死亡恐嚇。
現希望各位教友及公眾人士,在以下兩個公教報(Kung Kao Po) Facebook 連結留言,表達你對正義和平委員會的支持,不要讓他們孤單:
➡️《譴責李慧琼議會暴力》
https://www.facebook.com/106180922767098/posts/3165766180141875/?d=n
➡️ 《抗議警方利用疫情濫權濫捕》
https://www.facebook.com/106180922767098/posts/3170626479655845/?d=n
【聲明:抗議警方利用疫情濫權濫捕 】
當全香港市民抗疫接近成功之際,警方在母親節於各區進行瘋狂濫捕行為,警方的濫權令香港市民震驚,正委會對此表示憤怒和遺憾。
我們要求:
1.港府必須立即回應民間五大訴求,以徹底解決社會矛盾;
2.警方停止借疫情和以「限聚令」為由,打壓民間活動;
3.就近期針對記者的打壓行為,警方立即向新聞界道歉,並停止阻礙採訪自由的行徑;
4.因警察執法不公,撤銷所有和「限聚令」相關的無理票控;
5.立即成立獨立,具調查和檢控權力的「真」監警會。
「凡以毒害代替公正,棄正義於地的,是有禍的!」(亞5:7)
香港天主教正義和平委員會
2020年 5月11日
★ 聲明全文 (中文):http://www.hkjp.org/download.php?type=15&topic=54&id=758
Statement in English: http://www.hkjp.org/statement_en.php?id=33
❤️請訂閱正委 Telegram 頻道:https://t.me/hkjphkd❤️
社會運動english 在 阿兜仔不教美語 Youtube 的最讚貼文
訂閱!(Subscribe! ) ▶ http://lnk.pics/csG
最新的影片(NEW VIDS!)▶ http://pics.ee/gTO
【小遊戲 MINI GAME】
1. 有打哪一個錯字(大的字幕)?
2. 這集出現哪一些『#』?
3. 有沒有人想要跟摩天輪結婚?
【簡介description】
你對同志婚姻有什麼看法?
我覺得反對的理由很奇怪: 同志跟人獸交、社會毀滅、摩天輪、愛滋病沒有關係,同志就是人,幹嘛要把他們妖魔化?
別人有沒有一個不害我的權利,我不應該要管
#婚姻平權 #同志 #同志婚姻 #marriageptt #marryme #同志婚姻平權 #摩天輪 #gaymarriage #taiwangaymarriage
【黑素斯series】
阿兜仔不教美語(ADG NO ENGLISH) ▶ http://pics.ee/v-156128
阿兜仔LIVE ▶ http://pics.ee/v-156135
挖啥米?(Wasami?)▶ http://pics.ee/kzF
【黑素斯web】
FB ▶▶ http://lnk.pics/cqM
訂閱 ▶▶ http://lnk.pics/csG
YT ▶▶ http://lnk.pics/cqK
IG ▶▶ http://lnk.pics/cqL
Twitter ▶▶ http://lnk.pics/csH
Funkorama by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Source: http://incompetech.com/music/royalty-free/?keywords=funkorama
Artist: http://incompetech.com/
社會運動english 在 蕭新煌- 台灣一百年來的社會運動 - YouTube 的推薦與評價
演講日期:2021年12月8日演講講者:蕭新煌- 中央研究院 社會 學研究所特聘研究員、總統府資政110學年(上) 經典通識教育講座YouTube ... ... <看更多>
社會運動english 在 西方人的自由民主思想就是输入这片古老大地的其中一个元素并 ... 的推薦與評價
smksconfession435 浅谈中国公民社会运动(49年之前) 社会运动,英文名称为Social movement。是由个体或社会群体松散组织为了实现推动、执行、抵制、阻止或撤消社会 ... ... <看更多>