#獨家 世界衛生組織將台灣問題相關聲明稿下架!
世界衛生組織(WHO)在台灣時間今(6)日凌晨以 "How the World Health Organization works with all people, everywhere" 為題發了一篇聲明稿,試圖為排除台灣參與 WHO 辯解。不過這篇聲明卻在不到 24 小時內就被 WHO 網站下架,直至晚間6時30分仍呈現「找不到網頁」(This page cannot be found),《沃草》透過世衛網站暫存紀錄,獨家為大家揭露該篇聲明內容。
聲明中,WHO仍稱與台灣相關的事務為「中國台灣事務」( Taiwan, China issues),針對全球的種種批評,WHO 仍稱之為誤解(misunderstandings),並聲稱是有些人將「技術性的維護全球公共健康任務」與「決定 WHO 會員資格的權限」混淆,似乎打算以此來回應國際要求讓台灣加入 WHO 的呼聲。
聲明中多處重申 WHO 在 3 月 29 日公布的聲明(https://waa.tw/Qsu21N),認為 WHO 與台灣設有聯絡點、台灣專家曾參與 WHO 會議等,並表示台灣參與世界衛生大會的觀察員資格是在一次次的會員國投票中遭到否決,以及提起讓中華人民共和國取代中華民國聯合國席位的聯合國 2758 決議文,表示世界衛生大會遵循此決議及其中的一中原則。
似乎是為回應全球對 WHO 應對流行病能力的質疑,WHO 在聲明中表示「有些人可能認為 WHO 成員組成影響我們維護世界安全的能力,但更重要的是要了解我們的治理方式和實踐方式。」
暫存檔網址:https://waa.tw/dohkIm
聲明截圖:https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VP-KMgP4wb6Oy8jQkOjoSu-DWGS3Xqkb/view
原新聞稿網址:https://waa.tw/lFKd8M
(以下為世界衛生組織聲明原文)
標題:Update: How the World Health Organization works with all people, everywhere
發表時間:5 April 2020 Statement
內文:
In recent months we have seen misunderstandings in social media and the news media about how WHO manages global public health issues. In particular, there are a lot of questions about Taiwan, China issues. Some people are confusing WHO’s technical global public health mandate, with the mandate of countries to determine WHO’s membership. Countries decide this. The WHO Secretariat focuses on keeping the world safe.
WHO works to promote the health of all people, everywhere. Indeed, one of our overarching goals is Universal Health Coverage. #healthforall. We are an organization with a staff of physicians, scientists, researchers and public health experts who are committed to serving all people regardless of nationality, race, ethnicity, religion, gender.
This includes the people of Taiwan. We serve them through regular interactions with their experts and authorities on vital public health issues. This has been the case over many years, including during the COVID-19 pandemic.
It is understandable that some people might think that the composition of WHO’s membership affects our ability to keep the world safe. But it is important to understand both how we are governed and how we operate in practice.
WHO is part of the United Nations, whose membership is the mandate of countries. In 1971, countries of the world participating in the United Nations General Assembly recognized the People’s Republic of China as “the only legitimate representative of China,” in effect, a one-China policy. That is contained in UNGA Resolution 2758. In 1972, the World Health Assembly decided in WHA Resolution 25.1 to follow that.
Every year, members have a chance to discuss important proposals during the World Health Assembly, where rules and policies governing WHO are decided. For example, at different times, some countries have proposed giving Taiwan’s authorities a special status – that of observing the annual World Health Assembly.
There have been 14 times over the last 22 years (1997-2006; and in 2008, 2017, 2018, 2019) when countries discussed whether a delegation from Taiwan could attend the World Health Assembly as an observer. Each time the countries decided against it by consensus – except in 1997 and 2004 when there were votes: (by 128 votes to 19 in 1997; and by 133 votes to 25 in 2004). In 2007, the issue wasn’t observer status, but membership, and countries decided against considering that by a vote of 148 to 17.
There have been occasions when it was clear that there was general support among WHO countries for Taiwan to take an observer seat at the World Health Assembly. Between 2009 and 2016, it did so under the name “Chinese Taipei.”
But having a seat at the WHA, or not having a seat at the WHA, does not affect, in any way, whether an area or population benefits from WHO expertise and guidance. WHO helps all people, everywhere.
WHO and Taiwan’s health experts interact throughout the year on vital public health and scientific issues, according to well-established arrangements.
During the current COVID-19 pandemic, interactions have been stepped up, both through existing channels and new ones as well.
Here are examples of WHO-Taiwan interactions around the coronavirus pandemic:
-- There is an established International Health Regulations (IHR) Point of Contact (POC) for Taiwan. Taiwan’s POC receives IHR (2005) communications, provides IHR information updates from Taiwan directly to WHO Headquarters, and has access to the IHR Event Information Site (EIS) system. The EIS system is a password-protected database and information exchange platform supporting the IHR. It is the well-established platform for all IHR communications, back and forth, between WHO and IHR contacts.
-- Health experts from Taiwan participate in two of the key WHO networks set up in January 2020 to support WHO work in the global COVID-19 response. Three experts from Taiwan are part of the WHO Infection Prevention and Control Network: two are part of the WHO Clinical Network. Every week, they join some 60 to 80 other experts from around the globe through a WHO-hosted teleconference, working to advance our knowledge and guidance in this response.
-- Two public health experts from Taiwan participated in the Global Research and Innovation Forum organized by WHO on 11-12 February 2020. They took part, alongside other world scientists, in considering critical research questions and in finding ways to work together to advance the response.
-- Taiwan’s Field Epidemiology Training Program is a member of the Training Programs in Epidemiology and Public Health Interventions Network (also known as “TEPHINET”). WHO shares Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network alerts and requests for assistance with TEPHINET, and those messages are cascaded to the TEPHINET members.
-- WHO, through its technical lead, has directly briefed health authorities from Taiwan and has offered again.
--Taiwan’s health experts and authorities have open access to developments, guidance and other materials through the WHO’s website (www.who.int) and other digital platforms.
--They can access the www.OpenWHO.org platform, which hosts open online courses for decisionmakers and responders around the world. During the COVID-19 pandemic, OpenWHO usage has reached more than 1 million.
--WHO has a designated contact point with their office in Geneva. Through this channel, general questions are handled and when technical concerns arise, WHO technical responses are coordinated.
--WHO also interacts with Taiwan’s health authorities through the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control.
Importantly, the COVID-19 caseload in Taiwan is low relative to population. We continue to follow developments closely, and WHO is taking lessons learned from all areas.
Interactions with Taiwan during the response to the pandemic is not exceptional. Here are some examples of regular interactions with Taiwan’s health authorities and WHO, over many years, through well-established arrangements, and across many different global health concerns:
Over the course of 2019, Taiwan’s experts were invited to attend 9 WHO technical meetings. They attended 8 of these meetings, contributing to WHO expert processes on issues including immunization, drug-resistant TB, assistive technologies, vaccine safety and SDG targets on NCDs and Mental Health. Prior to the Covid-19 emergency, work was underway for more expert participation from Taiwan in 2020.
On influenza, Taiwan vaccine manufacturer Adimmune contributes to the WHO Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Framework (PIP Framework) and preparations are underway for concluding an agreement between WHO and Adimmune under the PIP Framework for pandemic influenza vaccine products;
In the fight against cancer, experts from Taiwan have contributed to key publications issued by the WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer;
In support of the International Health Regulations, an expert from Taiwan has been appointed to the IHR Expert Roster; and
On a range of other issues, from WHO pre-qualification practices for pharmaceutical manufacturers to malaria, there are exchanges with WHO on practical and technical issues.
It is fair to say that the contribution of Taiwan’s health experts to WHO, and their interactions with us, are well-developed and broad-based. And these interactions add value to the work of WHO and to global health.
同時也有1部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過4,930的網紅綝雪SnowLin,也在其Youtube影片中提到,IP位址參考(請選擇其中一個就好) 168.95.4.10 prod.telemetry.ros.rockstargames.com (台灣地區建議使用這個) 54.69.12.93 prod.telemetry.ros.rockstargames.com 54.69.237.59 prod...
hosts file 在 周庭 Agnes Chow Ting Facebook 的精選貼文
我到美國接受了星島中文電台的訪問,當中談及了公民抗命、DQ事件、民主自決等等,最後節目被改名(刪去了「民主自決」的字眼),甚至被下架。自今,星島中文電台仍未有解釋原因。
節目內容和編排,包括解釋民主自決的理念,也是電台一方建議的。如果星島因為政治敏感而將節目下架,為何當初要如此建議?再者,每個人也有談及自己政治主張的權利和自由,也有權不同意或作出批評,作為媒體,何必如此懼怕,要自我審查?
星島中文電台必須盡快清楚解釋,及把節目重新上載網頁,我們需要的是媒體,不是政權的喉舌。
(中文版本在英文版本下方)
==== Press Release: A protest against political censorship by Sing Tao Chinese Radio (AM1400) ====
Agnes Chow 周庭, who was disqualified in the Hong Kong LegCo by-election in January this year, was invited by Stanford Hong Kong Student Association to attend the Cantonese Awareness Week in mid April. Northern California Hong Kong Club had coordinated with the hosts of a current affairs talk show 焦點訪談 of Sing Tao Chinese Radio (AM1400) to arrange Agnes Chow and another ex-Scholarism member appearing in the 4/17 (Tuesday) show.
Everything went smoothly and there were good interaction among the host, the guests and the audience. As usual, the program recording was archived in the show web site (http://www.chineseradio.com/…/%E7%AF%80%E7%9B%AE…/cm-f09-10/) in the same afternoon.
Alerted by a friend, however, we noticed that the recording of this particular episode has gone through sequences of editing and censorship afterward.
1) The title of the episode has changed from "04/17/2018 香港眾志常委周庭闡述香港自決主張" to "04/17/2018 訪問香港眾志常委周庭".
2) Starting from 4/19 (Thu) afternoon or earlier, the link of this episode no longer works while all other older and newer episodes work just fine. (See the attached screen capture: singtao_0421.png.)
In fact, we found out only the MP3 file of this episode (http://archive.chineseradio.com/Archive/C20180417_09-10.mp3) is removed or renamed. The episode one day before (http://archive.chineseradio.com/Archive/C20180416_09-10.mp3) and one day after (http://archive.chineseradio.com/Archive/C20180418_09-10.mp3) are still accessible.
3) We notified the host on 4/19 (Thu) about this issue. Later on, we filed a formal complaint through its official contacts with email and online message board. Not only do we not get any official response, but the operation to block this episode also seems to step up.
4) Starting from 4/23 (Mon) afternoon or earlier, even the web page of the whole talk show archive is removed (screen capture: singtao_0423.png) and a new archive page is created (screen capture: singtao_0424.png). In this new page, however, the 4/17 episode disappears and all other episodes have no title. Besides, this talk show is missing in the archive page of all cantonese programs (screen capture: singtao_cantonese_0424.png). All these appear to be a cover-up for the removal of the episode involing Agnes Chow.
So far, we do not receive any official explanation. Based on the sequences of events, the only logical conclusion is that the blocking is an intended political censorship and not a technical error.
Let us be clear that we had had good working relationship with the hosts in the past. We appreciated their openness and professionalism to invite different spectrum of view points to their program.
We suspect this post-censorship is an intervention from the senior management of the Sing Tao Group, as the political leaning of the owner and the editor in chief of the Sing Tao Group is well known.
We have to ask the Sing Tao senior management:
- Why are you so afraid of a 21-year-old activist has to say?
- The director of HK ETO in San Francisco was willing to attend the panel discussion in Stanford on the very same day (4/17) to debate Agnes Chow head on. Where is your courage?
Although the majority of the mass media in Hong Kong has been influenced directly or indirectly by mainland China or pro-establishment interest, it is a whole different matter when such political censorship happens in the United States. According to the Foreign Agents Registration Act, an organization and persons have to disclose the related activities and finances if they act "at the order, request, or under the direction or control" of a foreign power. As such, we would like to remind our media friends in the United States about the potential consequence of your action.
Northern California Hong Kong Club
2017-04-24
[Background information]
梁建鋒 (Editor in Chief of Sing Tao Group): 百無小政客
https://www.singtaousa.com/…/481534-%E7%99%BE%E7%84%A1%E5%…/
维基百科: 何柱國 (Owner of Sing Tao Group)
https://zh.wikipedia.org/…/%E4%BD%95%E6%9F%B1%E5%9C%8B_(%E5…
Foreign Agents Registration Act
https://en.wikipedia.org/wi…/Foreign_Agents_Registration_Act
_________________________________________________
==== 4月17日是怎樣被星島中文電台消失的 ====
今年一月在香港立法會補選中被奪去參選資格的香港眾志常委周庭,應史丹福大學香港同學會的邀請,到訪灣區參加四月中旬的廣東話週。北加洲香港會協調安排了周庭與另一位前學民思潮成員,於4月17日(星期二)在星島中文電台(AM1400)「焦點訪談」節目中接受現場訪問。
訪問過程順利,主持人、來賓和聽眾互動良好。當日節目重温一如既往,當天下午即存檔在節目網站(http://www.chineseradio.com/…/%E7%AF%80%E7%9B%AE…/cm-f09-10/)。
然而,一位朋友稍後注意到當曰節目重温連結出現了問題,她把這事情告知我們。我們開始跟進,發現該連結經過一系列的編輯和疑似審查:
1)當日節目重温標題,由原先的“04/17/2018 香港眾志常委周庭闡述香港自決主張”,後被改為“04/17/2018 訪問香港眾志常委周庭”。
2)從4月19日(星期四)下午或更早的時候開始, 當日節目重温連結失效,然而所有其他較新或較舊的節目重温連結仍正常工作。(參閱屏幕截圖:singtao_0421.png)
我們發現只有這一集的MP3語音文件(http://archive.chineseradio.com/Archive/C20180417_09-10.mp3)被刪除或重新命名。 之前一天(http://archive.chineseradio.com/Archive/C20180416_09-10.mp3)和之後的一天(http://archive.chineseradio.com/Archive/C20180418_09-10.mp3)的文件則完好無缺。
3)4月19日(星期四)下午,我們通知星島中文電台主持人有關事宜。之後我們再依正式途徑,用電郵和網上留言投訴。我們不但沒有得到回覆,星島對該節目的屏閉動作反而更進一步。
4)從4月23日(週一)下午或更早的時候開始,整個「焦點訪談」節目的原有重温網頁亦被删除(參閱屏幕截圖:singtao_0423.png),而新建了一個重温網頁(參閱屏幕截圖:singtao_0424.png)。在這個新的網頁中,4月17日消失了,而其他日子亦沒有題目。另外在羅列所有粤語節目的網頁中 (singtao_cantonese_0424.png),「焦點訪談」亦不見了。種種動作,似乎是對周庭訪問重温被消失作掩飾。
到目前為止,我們沒有收到星島中文電台的任何解釋。根據事件的發展時序,唯一合乎邏輯的結論是,封鎖是有意的政治審查,而不是技術上的錯誤。
我們一直與「焦點訪談」節目主持人有著良好的工作關係。我們讚賞他們以專業及開放的態度,邀請不同的觀點的來賓到他們的節目發表言論。
我們認為這次審查是源於管理高層的介入,星島集團主席和總編輯的政治傾向是眾所周知的。
我們必須問星島集團管理高層:
- 為什麼你們如此害怕一個21歲的年青人的言論?
- 舊金山香港經貿辦主任,就在同一天(4月17日)願意出席史丹福大學的香港問題討論會,面對面與周庭同場討論。為何你們沒有這個勇氣?
儘管香港傳媒近年常因中國大陸或親建制勢力的影響,而直接或間接的進行政治審查。但要在美國進行這樣的政治審查,則要面對一種完全不一樣的環境。根據美國“外國代理人註冊法”,如果一個組織和個人,在外國勢力的指揮或控制下行事,他們必須披露相關活動和財務聯繫。我們想提醒身在美國的媒體朋友,注意你們的行為可能引起的後果。
北加州香港會
2017年4月24日
hosts file 在 綝雪SnowLin Youtube 的最佳貼文
IP位址參考(請選擇其中一個就好)
168.95.4.10 prod.telemetry.ros.rockstargames.com
(台灣地區建議使用這個)
54.69.12.93 prod.telemetry.ros.rockstargames.com
54.69.237.59 prod.telemetry.ros.rockstargames.com
54.68.122.117 prod.telemetry.ros.rockstargames.com
54.201.204.47 prod.telemetry.ros.rockstargames.com
54.191.248.184 prod.telemetry.ros.rockstargames.com
54.213.190.197 prod.telemetry.ros.rockstargames.com
54.200.247.207 prod.telemetry.ros.rockstargames.com
54.148.189.169 prod.telemetry.ros.rockstargames.com
54.213.155.230 prod.telemetry.ros.rockstargames.com
54.201.225.240 prod.telemetry.ros.rockstargames.com
檢測程式
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6gItM6oWE88eE0yNlNCc1huemc/view
路徑位址C:\Windows\System32\drivers\etc
尋找一個 Hosts的檔案
以記事本方式打開
GTA5 連線問題 解決方式(ㄧ) DNS設定教學
https://youtu.be/Q4OfxUp3bdM
GTA5 連線問題 解決方式(二) VPN設定教學
https://youtu.be/rzDKUsfPN1g
GTA5 連線問題 解決方式(三) 防火牆設定
https://youtu.be/rcrC7bQDNEc
GTA5 連線問題 解決方式(五) 其他VPN處理方式
https://youtu.be/4VXLNaYtk78
有想看什麼測試的可以在底下留言
可以的話我會盡量拍給大家
Twitch:https://www.twitch.tv/snowlin
YouTube:https://www.youtube.com/c/SnowLin
Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/SnowLin0427/
微博:http://weibo.com/SnowLin0427
贊助連結
PayPal:https://streamlabs.com/snowlin
台灣:https://payment.ecpay.com.tw/Broadcaster/Donate/F97F274C96AB672CFA7DCF0BF42D002D
hosts file 在 etc/hosts on Windows - gists · GitHub 的推薦與評價
For Windows NT, Windows 2000, and Windows XP · Click Start > All Programs > Accessories > Notepad. · Click File > Open. · In the File name field, type C:\Windows\ ... ... <看更多>