#Editorial AppleDailyHK | "The awakened lions and wolf warriors that bite are not just engaging Australia and the U.S. in trade wars, but have not hesitated on imposing sanctions on entities and personnel of the U.S. and E.U. However, there is no shortage of self-defeating examples of wolf warrior diplomacy: overthrowing the preliminary agreement on Sino-U.S. trade negotiations in May of last year, hard-selling the Hong Kong version of the National Security Law, and the sanctions of the E.U. and the European Parliament lawmakers."
Read more: https://bit.ly/3fxQ5i5
"會咬人的醒獅、戰狼,不只與澳洲、美國打貿易戰,對美國、歐盟的實體和人員的制裁也不手軟。然而,戰狼外交不乏殺敵八百、自損一千的例子。前年5月推翻中美貿易談判初步協議如此,去年硬銷港版國安法如此,今次制裁歐洲議會議員也是如此。"
____________
📱Download the app:
http://onelink.to/appledailyapp
📰 Latest news:
http://appledaily.com/engnews/
🐤 Follow us on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/appledaily_hk
💪🏻 Subscribe and show your support:
https://bit.ly/2ZYKpHP
#AppleDailyENG
同時也有1部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過10萬的網紅Johnny Talk,也在其Youtube影片中提到,NBA即將復賽,但目前看起來有點混亂,狀況老實說有點多,畢竟除了健康的因素之外,美國目前還有社會運動在進行,我們上一集有聊到,包括Kyrie Irving 等球員都反對復賽,而聯盟在當時也宣布球員自己可以決定要不要參加復賽,聯盟並不會強迫也不會有懲罰,但會扣薪水,這當然是合理的,對於聯盟或球員公會的...
warriors trade news 在 李怡 Facebook 的精選貼文
Entanglement under chilling effect (Lee Yee)
The first line of the “Manifesto of the Communist Party” issued in 1848 said: “A spectre is haunting Europe – the spectre of communism”. Back then, Hong Kong was about to open for trade. And now, this “spectre of communism” has dressed in a national security law, haunting Hong Kong. Since the National Security Law taking effect last week, the ferocious voices of resistance have been fading out of the media. Chris Yeung, the Chairperson of the Hong Kong Journalists Association, has pointed out that “chilling effect” has turned up. He was asked by a reporter whether it is still at journalists’ option to interview Chris Patten. Except for Apple Daily, almost all media have drawn a veil over any affairs pertaining to the National Security Law. Even perennial contributors to the forum and finance section of the news medium have bidden farewell to readers.
In the past few days, my relatives overseas and friends in Hong Kong have been more attentive to me than usual, not asking me if I would leave Hong Kong, but telling me to leave. Will I leave off writing? Is writing with extreme caution worthwhile? I am already at an advanced age, and have already accomplished what I aspired to.
Though I encouraged readers “not to get predominated by fear” in my column last week, to say I am not scared is to deceive myself and others, not least when being confronted with a law of extreme power from a country alien to us. Hong Kongers are used to observing laws, inclusive of the evil ones. Beijing and Hong Kong government officials have asked Hong Kong people time and again not to defy the law, yet on the day of promulgation when the citizens were still digesting it, the law was enforced in a manner we are not familiar with. How could journalists and columnists not feel threatened?
The National Security Law pledges respect and protection for human rights, including freedom of speech, assembly and demonstration. The said rights are enshrined in the Constitution of the People’s Republic of China as well, but their implementation is a far cry from those implemented in Hong Kong in the past. In my lifetime career as an editor and writer, I had been able to say anything and express any opinions including those in demonstrations. Before the National Security Law coming into effect, the judicature in Hong Kong had changed already. Afterward, it will only get worse.
In legal cases of western countries with a common law system, “promoting” and ‘instigating” are not considered criminal acts because they are intents which are intangible, invisible and unprovable, and it is hardly possible to demarcate “instigating” from “appealing” , and “promoting” from “advocating”. Yet, in recent years, Hong Kong courts have been making sentences based on the offence of “inciting”. Under the National Security Law, it is barely feasible for me to talk the court out of sentencing me for “inciting” with my commentaries.
I just write to put forward my viewpoints that are open to free interpretations of which I do not have foreknowledge, whereby I can ensure my writings do not “incite” Hong Kong citizens to “loathe” the central and SAR government. However, once the sentiment is generated, the author is embroiled in a legal case.
The National Security Law states that “the HKSAR shall promote national security education in schools and through social organisations, the media, the internet and other means”. Is it a crime not to promote “national security education” in schools and through the media and the internet, inasmuch as it is a law already?
Two words “and universities” were put after “in schools” in the English edition issued three days after the promulgation of the Law. Shall we follow the Chinese or English edition? Will there be more updates coming up?
Two days ago, the Committee for Safeguarding National Security established in accordance with the National Security Law issued “Detailed Rules for Implementation” in a meeting, in which Article 5 stipulates that the authorities shall “call for information about activities relating to Hong Kong from foreign and Taiwan’s political organizations and their respective representatives.” If foreign and Taiwan’s political organizations and their representatives do not provide the police with information as required, the relevant personnel will face 6 months in jail and a fine of HKD100,000 upon conviction; if the information provided is fake, incorrect or incomplete, a 2-year jail and a fine of HKD100,000 are expected.
How is the implementation of the National Security Law enforced on overseas countries and Taiwan? How are people in those countries convicted of the crime? Will wolf warriors be dispatched to the U.S. and Taiwan to snatch them back to Hong Kong? Taiwan Executive Yuan President Su Tsengchang responded, “The law enacted in China goes so far as to exercise jurisdiction over everywhere and all the peoples around the world, even over Taiwan.”
The National Security Law and its enforcement is too elusive for ordinary people to understand, and impalpable for writers to manoeuvre. If it is too precarious for one to tread a tightrope, staying away from it is an easy way out. Is it the writing or the person that should stay away from it? This is exactly the entanglement a lot of writers and I cannot stay away from for now.
warriors trade news 在 Johnny Talk Youtube 的最佳解答
NBA即將復賽,但目前看起來有點混亂,狀況老實說有點多,畢竟除了健康的因素之外,美國目前還有社會運動在進行,我們上一集有聊到,包括Kyrie Irving 等球員都反對復賽,而聯盟在當時也宣布球員自己可以決定要不要參加復賽,聯盟並不會強迫也不會有懲罰,但會扣薪水,這當然是合理的,對於聯盟或球員公會的決定,我必須要說,他們已經做到該做的事了,接下來咱們就來看看有哪些球員確定不參加復賽吧!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
🛍Johnny腦公的店⬇︎
https://johnnyjj0319.1shop.tw/cbyc5q
🍷贊助強尼喝雪山⬇︎
https://payment.opay.tw/Broadcaster/Donate/C19CBBC7C47629E97FCF30EBC6615806
🔰訂閱Johnny頻道⬇︎
https://lihi1.com/QJJEM
✍合作諮詢 ⬇︎
s1069112@g.ncyu.edu.tw
📱Johnny粉專⬇︎
https://lihi1.com/nPXJP
📷使用錄影設備 ⬇︎
http://tinyurl.com/ya3qsggt
💻使用電腦設備 ⬇︎
http://tinyurl.com/y7ycltxq
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
💬更多球星介紹
‣‣智勇雙全的閃電指揮官|太陽初代傳奇鋼炮後衛 Kevin Johnson!
https://youtu.be/5ZP0BytmsZQ
‣‣公牛王朝不可或缺的一塊拼圖| 史上最偉大的籃板悍將Dennis Rodman!
https://youtu.be/ogd-dN4mz3w
‣‣平凡的路人,偉大的助攻王John Stockton!
https://youtu.be/xFcbeM0xuaU
目前往62000訂閱努力,如果覺得我的影片作的很用心,別忘了替我按下訂閱哦,謝謝!
#NBA
#湖人隊
#2020賽季
音樂「Audionautix」創作的「All Good In The Wood」是根據「Creative Commons Attribution」(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/...) 授權使用 演出者:http://audionautix.com/
Track: Dirty Palm - Freakshow (feat. LexBlaze) [NCS Release]
warriors trade news 在 Warriors Rumors: Rudy Gobert Trade For Andrew Wiggins ... 的推薦與評價
Golden State Warriors rumors are on tap for Warriors Today by Chat Sports. Nuggets vs. Warriors in the NBA playoffs resumes on Wednesday ... ... <看更多>