第四集 (一連七集) 哈佛知識分享: What is strategy? How do you create value? 什麼是策略 ? 你如何創造價值?
一開始我講過:
"The first test of a strategy is whether your value proposition is different from your rivals. If you are trying to serve the same customers and meet the same needs and sell at the same relative price, then you don't have a strategy. " by Michael Porter
如果你嘅價值主張係同你嘅競爭對手一樣, 即係話你服務緊同一班顧客, 解決緊同一問題, 收緊差唔多價錢的話, 哈佛教授米高波特就講你係「人做你做」,你「無策略」 。
咁何謂一個好嘅策略 Good Strategy? 教授講要經得起五個 Tests:
A distinctive value proposition 獨特的價值主張
A tailored value chain 度身訂造的企業價值鏈
Trade-offs different from rivals 同競爭對手不同的「取捨」
Fit across value chain 成條企業價值鏈的活動要配合
Continuity over time 持續性、持續性,不能一時一樣
今集先再你講(1) 同 (2)。 (1) 何謂獨特的價值主張? 你先回答以下三條問題,睇下你同競爭對手有乜唔同。
Which customers are you serving? (What end users? What channels?) 你服務緊邊班客? 誰是最終顧客? 什麼渠道接觸他們?
Which needs are you going to meet? (What products、features、services?) 你想滿足他們什麼需求? 什麼產品、特徵 、服務?
What relative price? (Premium or discount?) 相比起競爭對手,你打算賣貴啲或平啲?
"The value proposition is the element of strategy that looks outward at customers, at the demand side of the business. The value chain focuses internally on operations. Strategy is fundamentally integrative, bringing the demand and supply sides together." by Michael Porter
策略入面的「價值主張」 是從由顧客的「需求」角度出發。 「企業價值鏈」反而是由內部的營運流程「供應」出發。 策略的基礎就係把「需求」及「供應」兩者整合在一起。
你要有好嘅策略,你就要第 (2) Have a tailored value chain 有一條度身訂造的企業價值鏈。由入貨、加工、包裝、市場推廣、 銷售 、出貨、至售後服務都要同競爭對手唔同, 都係度身訂做去服務你以上「價值主張」要服務的顧客。
Michael Porter 話做生意常犯嘅錯誤,亦都係最忌嘅就係 "Stuck in the middle" 「卡住喺中間」。即係平又唔係平過人, 靚又唔係靚過人, 服務嗰班客或者佢哋嘅需求又唔係特別嘅過人,咁你就乜唔係,「價值主張」無乜特別,好難突出。咁你可以點?
例如, 如果就咁開間租車公司,你點同業界巨頭 Hertz, Budget, Avis 打呢? 好容易就 "Stuck in the middle", 因此絕大部分嘅租車公司你都唔會識,我亦都唔會提。 但美國有間獨特的租車公司,Zipcar, 佢同一般嘅租車公司好唔同。
Zipcar 唔係好似絕大部分嘅租車公司咁, target 區外客, 到咗某個城市要租車週圍走。佢係 target 平時市區內住,無養車, 但突然間想租車走一轉嘅人仕。佢唔係按「日租」,而係按「時租」, 你想去超級市場買一轉餸都可以租。
Zipcar冇話特定嘅租車中心, 而係啲車周街泊, 透過佢嘅Apps 你就知道架車泊咗係邊度及還車地點。 咁就更加方便同埋近你屋企。公司營運成本都平好多。
Zipcar 的車種經常畀人感覺係較 “Cool" ,比較型仔啲、環保啲。 佢唔會花好多錢大賣電視/戶外廣告,而係喺架車身上面貼住大大個公司 hip logo,變相周街免費流動廣告。
Zipcar 叫自己做 Car Sharing Company, not Car Rental Company。因為唔係個個人都租得,而只係付月費/年費的會員才能夠租。 依家月費每月7元美金或年費70元美金。咁佢就可以每次收費更平出租,但重複地賺你個月費年費。 佢想建立個形象就係 Car Sharing 遠遠環保過自己一個買架、保養、同埋棄置成架車。專攻年輕、活躍、較 "Green“ 的新一代。
Zipcar 仲有好多好多嘅特點講唔晒。總之就係,佢嘅 value proposition 價值主張 (Which Customers? Which Needs? What Relative Price?) 同所有其他租車公司巨頭都唔同, 成條嘅企業價值都係為咗個「價值主張」而去度身訂,同所有競爭對手都好唔同。
記住前幾集我同你講過,what's the right mind-set for competition? 你應該點諗競爭?
盡量得,你應該諗 Not be the the best, but be unique。 唔係要做到最好,而係做到最獨特。Zipcar is unique.
Not be number 1, but earn higher returns. 唔係要做到第一,而係要多啲回報,賺多啲錢! Zipcar 回報最高嘅係不斷重複收嘅月費年費,最穩定。
Not focus on market share, but focus on profits. 唔係要市佔率,係要利潤。Zipcar 賺錢。
Not serve the "best" customer with "best" product, but meet the diverse needs of target customers. 唔係要「最好」嘅產品,畀「最好」嘅客。而係用唔同嘅產品,滿足唔同顧客嘅需求。Zipcar 班客同其他租車公司好唔同。
Not compete by imitation, but compete by innovation. 唔係人做你做,而係要創新! Zipcar 肯定創新。
Not ZERO SUM game, but POSITIVE SUM. 唔係「零和遊戲」、互相廝殺, 而係大家從不同層面創造價值, 可以有好多個贏家。Zipcar 吸引咗一班平時唔係租開車嘅客, 佢做大咗個餅。
Zipcar 就係做到上 "Be Unique“ 嘅表表者。因此短短幾年間就可以係租車業界一支箭咁標上去,2000年係美國波士頓創立, 2013年就俾另一租車業界巨頭 Avis Budget Group 以美金5億收購了。2016年9月 Zipcar 公佈,全球9個國家,500個城市,擁有超過一百萬個會員。 一百萬個付費會員, 即使全部人唔租車,只係收月費年費都幾和味。 呢個就係我成日所講嘅做生意要做「農夫」,唔好做「獵人」,必須要客人係重複性購買, 你塊田先至會越嚟越大。
包括我自己在內,如果我純粹買賣舖, 根本我同其他商舖投資者無分別, 我錢又唔夠佢哋多,經驗又唔夠佢哋老到。 直接對撼,I have no strategy! 但我做「商舖基金」就完全唔同啦。班目標顧客、佢哋嘅需求、我所收嘅價錢,都完全唔同。 大家都係做「舖」,但我成條做「舖」嘅「企業價值鏈」, 由集資、買舖、 整理間舖、搵租客、諗計仔幫佢做多啲生意、至出售間舖、同售後服務, 都係同其他競爭對手唔同。亦都解釋咗點解, 即使社運/肺炎,我哋基金每季集資起碼6000港幣都季季爆額,近年全香港買賣街舖無人多過我哋, 我相信只要我哋專注係我哋條買舖的獨特嘅「企業價值鏈」,未來幾十年香港都唔會有人買賣舖多過我哋。
"Choices in the value proposition that limit what a company will do are essential to strategy because they create the opportunity to tailor activities in a way that best delivers that kind of value." by Michael Porter
「選擇」係重要嘅! 你公司就要選有乜嘢做,同更重要 - 有乜嘢唔做,咁你先至可以更加度身訂造地做好你成條「企業價值鏈」,去為你嘅「價值主張」創造最佳價值。
有興趣一齊研究下點做? 聽多啲 Michael Porter,就來我星期六嘅早餐會啦! 下集我再同你講 (3) Trade-offs different from rivals 同競爭對手,應該有什麼不同的「取捨」?
。。。。。
My hobby 《星期六早餐會》!
九月份早餐會 Topic: Applying "Michael Porter" to your business: How to compete and win!
哈佛分享: 如何應用「米高波特」於你盤生意? 點競爭? 點贏?
講起哈佛策略教授, 無人出名過 Michael Porter. 有幸我2017年在哈佛親身上過他教的課程, 今次早餐會同你分享,希望對你做生意亦有所啟發。
有興趣參加啦 😃 每次限四位 (包括我)。 人多傾唔到計。
9月份,逢星期六早上9時開始,約三小時。地點中環。
對象: 中小企老闆/創業者/公司管理層,連我限4位。
有興趣參加的話,請 whatsapp 你的名片給 Suki (我助手) (+852) 5566 1335。
我唔係靠呢行搵食,免費,我請食早餐 😉 Be friends ..... 有機會到時見你。李根興 Edwin
www.edwinlee.com.hk
www.bwfund.com
聯絡李根興 whatsapp (+852) 90361143
#michael_porter #競爭策略
同時也有56部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過14萬的網紅モクシロク,也在其Youtube影片中提到,Short Film 「CHOICE」 Are we blessed to be born? What is blessing? realistic element? Or the sense of blessing a blessing itself? 我々は祝福され生まれてきたのであろうか...
「relative to」的推薦目錄:
- 關於relative to 在 Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於relative to 在 Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於relative to 在 Benny Price Fitness Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於relative to 在 モクシロク Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於relative to 在 煮家男人 Bob's Your Uncle Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於relative to 在 賓狗單字Bingo Bilingual Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於relative to 在 #include directive: relative to where? - Stack Overflow 的評價
relative to 在 Facebook 的精選貼文
第四集 (一連七集) 哈佛知識分享: What is strategy? How do you create value? 什麼是策略 ? 你如何創造價值?
一開始我講過:
"The first test of a strategy is whether your value proposition is different from your rivals. If you are trying to serve the same customers and meet the same needs and sell at the same relative price, then you don't have a strategy. " by Michael Porter
如果你嘅價值主張係同你嘅競爭對手一樣, 即係話你服務緊同一班顧客, 解決緊同一問題, 收緊差唔多價錢的話, 哈佛教授米高波特就講你係「人做你做」,你「無策略」 。
咁何謂一個好嘅策略 Good Strategy? 教授講要經得起五個 Tests:
A distinctive value proposition 獨特的價值主張
A tailored value chain 度身訂造的企業價值鏈
Trade-offs different from rivals 同競爭對手不同的「取捨」
Fit across value chain 成條企業價值鏈的活動要配合
Continuity over time 持續性、持續性,不能一時一樣
今集先再你講(1) 同 (2)。 (1) 何謂獨特的價值主張? 你先回答以下三條問題,睇下你同競爭對手有乜唔同。
Which customers are you serving? (What end users? What channels?) 你服務緊邊班客? 誰是最終顧客? 什麼渠道接觸他們?
Which needs are you going to meet? (What products、features、services?) 你想滿足他們什麼需求? 什麼產品、特徵 、服務?
What relative price? (Premium or discount?) 相比起競爭對手,你打算賣貴啲或平啲?
"The value proposition is the element of strategy that looks outward at customers, at the demand side of the business. The value chain focuses internally on operations. Strategy is fundamentally integrative, bringing the demand and supply sides together." by Michael Porter
策略入面的「價值主張」 是從由顧客的「需求」角度出發。 「企業價值鏈」反而是由內部的營運流程「供應」出發。 策略的基礎就係把「需求」及「供應」兩者整合在一起。
你要有好嘅策略,你就要第 (2) Have a tailored value chain 有一條度身訂造的企業價值鏈。由入貨、加工、包裝、市場推廣、 銷售 、出貨、至售後服務都要同競爭對手唔同, 都係度身訂做去服務你以上「價值主張」要服務的顧客。
Michael Porter 話做生意常犯嘅錯誤,亦都係最忌嘅就係 "Stuck in the middle" 「卡住喺中間」。即係平又唔係平過人, 靚又唔係靚過人, 服務嗰班客或者佢哋嘅需求又唔係特別嘅過人,咁你就乜唔係,「價值主張」無乜特別,好難突出。咁你可以點?
例如, 如果就咁開間租車公司,你點同業界巨頭 Hertz, Budget, Avis 打呢? 好容易就 "Stuck in the middle", 因此絕大部分嘅租車公司你都唔會識,我亦都唔會提。 但美國有間獨特的租車公司,Zipcar, 佢同一般嘅租車公司好唔同。
Zipcar 唔係好似絕大部分嘅租車公司咁, target 區外客, 到咗某個城市要租車週圍走。佢係 target 平時市區內住,無養車, 但突然間想租車走一轉嘅人仕。佢唔係按「日租」,而係按「時租」, 你想去超級市場買一轉餸都可以租。
Zipcar冇話特定嘅租車中心, 而係啲車周街泊, 透過佢嘅Apps 你就知道架車泊咗係邊度及還車地點。 咁就更加方便同埋近你屋企。公司營運成本都平好多。
Zipcar 的車種經常畀人感覺係較 “Cool" ,比較型仔啲、環保啲。 佢唔會花好多錢大賣電視/戶外廣告,而係喺架車身上面貼住大大個公司 hip logo,變相周街免費流動廣告。
Zipcar 叫自己做 Car Sharing Company, not Car Rental Company。因為唔係個個人都租得,而只係付月費/年費的會員才能夠租。 依家月費每月7元美金或年費70元美金。咁佢就可以每次收費更平出租,但重複地賺你個月費年費。 佢想建立個形象就係 Car Sharing 遠遠環保過自己一個買架、保養、同埋棄置成架車。專攻年輕、活躍、較 "Green“ 的新一代。
Zipcar 仲有好多好多嘅特點講唔晒。總之就係,佢嘅 value proposition 價值主張 (Which Customers? Which Needs? What Relative Price?) 同所有其他租車公司巨頭都唔同, 成條嘅企業價值都係為咗個「價值主張」而去度身訂,同所有競爭對手都好唔同。
記住前幾集我同你講過,what's the right mind-set for competition? 你應該點諗競爭?
盡量得,你應該諗 Not be the the best, but be unique。 唔係要做到最好,而係做到最獨特。Zipcar is unique.
Not be number 1, but earn higher returns. 唔係要做到第一,而係要多啲回報,賺多啲錢! Zipcar 回報最高嘅係不斷重複收嘅月費年費,最穩定。
Not focus on market share, but focus on profits. 唔係要市佔率,係要利潤。Zipcar 賺錢。
Not serve the "best" customer with "best" product, but meet the diverse needs of target customers. 唔係要「最好」嘅產品,畀「最好」嘅客。而係用唔同嘅產品,滿足唔同顧客嘅需求。Zipcar 班客同其他租車公司好唔同。
Not compete by imitation, but compete by innovation. 唔係人做你做,而係要創新! Zipcar 肯定創新。
Not ZERO SUM game, but POSITIVE SUM. 唔係「零和遊戲」、互相廝殺, 而係大家從不同層面創造價值, 可以有好多個贏家。Zipcar 吸引咗一班平時唔係租開車嘅客, 佢做大咗個餅。
Zipcar 就係做到上 "Be Unique“ 嘅表表者。因此短短幾年間就可以係租車業界一支箭咁標上去,2000年係美國波士頓創立, 2013年就俾另一租車業界巨頭 Avis Budget Group 以美金5億收購了。2016年9月 Zipcar 公佈,全球9個國家,500個城市,擁有超過一百萬個會員。 一百萬個付費會員, 即使全部人唔租車,只係收月費年費都幾和味。 呢個就係我成日所講嘅做生意要做「農夫」,唔好做「獵人」,必須要客人係重複性購買, 你塊田先至會越嚟越大。
包括我自己在內,如果我純粹買賣舖, 根本我同其他商舖投資者無分別, 我錢又唔夠佢哋多,經驗又唔夠佢哋老到。 直接對撼,I have no strategy! 但我做「商舖基金」就完全唔同啦。班目標顧客、佢哋嘅需求、我所收嘅價錢,都完全唔同。 大家都係做「舖」,但我成條做「舖」嘅「企業價值鏈」, 由集資、買舖、 整理間舖、搵租客、諗計仔幫佢做多啲生意、至出售間舖、同售後服務, 都係同其他競爭對手唔同。亦都解釋咗點解, 即使社運/肺炎,我哋基金每季集資起碼6000港幣都季季爆額,近年全香港買賣街舖無人多過我哋, 我相信只要我哋專注係我哋條買舖的獨特嘅「企業價值鏈」,未來幾十年香港都唔會有人買賣舖多過我哋。
"Choices in the value proposition that limit what a company will do are essential to strategy because they create the opportunity to tailor activities in a way that best delivers that kind of value." by Michael Porter
「選擇」係重要嘅! 你公司就要選有乜嘢做,同更重要 - 有乜嘢唔做,咁你先至可以更加度身訂造地做好你成條「企業價值鏈」,去為你嘅「價值主張」創造最佳價值。
有興趣一齊研究下點做? 聽多啲 Michael Porter,就來我星期六嘅早餐會啦! 下集我再同你講 (3) Trade-offs different from rivals 同競爭對手,應該有什麼不同的「取捨」?
。。。。。
My hobby 《星期六早餐會》!
九月份早餐會 Topic: Applying "Michael Porter" to your business: How to compete and win!
哈佛分享: 如何應用「米高波特」於你盤生意? 點競爭? 點贏?
講起哈佛策略教授, 無人出名過 Michael Porter. 有幸我2017年在哈佛親身上過他教的課程, 今次早餐會同你分享,希望對你做生意亦有所啟發。
有興趣參加啦 😃 每次限四位 (包括我)。 人多傾唔到計。
9月份,逢星期六早上9時開始,約三小時。地點中環。
對象: 中小企老闆/創業者/公司管理層,連我限4位。
有興趣參加的話,請 whatsapp 你的名片給 Suki (我助手) (+852) 5566 1335。
我唔係靠呢行搵食,免費,我請食早餐 😉 Be friends ..... 有機會到時見你。李根興 Edwin
www.edwinlee.com.hk
www.bwfund.com
聯絡李根興 whatsapp (+852) 90361143
#michael_porter #競爭策略
relative to 在 Benny Price Fitness Facebook 的最佳貼文
An simple fix to maximise your sets! (Audio improves after 15s)
-
You’ll have seen me whinging about Matrix machines a lot recently having spent years exploring different brands and the past few months working with perfectly modified ones at the @resistancetrainingspecialist HQ in the US, but in reality that’s not what goes on behind the scenes 😉
-
Every machine has a way for it to be adapted, a workaround to improve how efficient time spent on it can be. I thought I’d show you one of the simplest methods taught on the RTS course 🤓
-
It’s not rocket science 🚀 Am I saying you will get NO GAINS if you use standard reps on the machine? 😂 ‘Course not. Plenty have built insanely big quads kicking knee extensions into the atmosphere and hoping for the best.
Am I saying using momentum will make your knees explode on your first rep? Nope. They’d probably be illegal if so 🤨
-
But I like my training effort to yield as much reward as possible, with as little joint risk relative to my stimulus as possible. Therefore you won’t catch me doing volume that doesn’t either contribute to my set preparation or working stimulus, so you can miss me with under-challenged ranges or throwing inertial variables in there 👀
-
Simple blanket sound-bites mean people either treat this machine like football training or like they’ll catch the plague in their knee if they sit on it 🤦🏻♂️
Maybe if they were designed and used better with an appropriate understanding of how internal forces match external ones we’d get away from that 🤷🏻♂️
-
Another bonus of thinking about movements in terms of specific ranges? You just might be able to make them work for even more people! 😃 Think about it... is pain usually present throughout the entire range? 🤔
-
👍🏽 It’s one thing being obsessed with having someone capable of producing force through every range of joint positions they have available... it’s another to blindly take that to mean you should train to “FULL ROM” in every movement 🧐
relative to 在 モクシロク Youtube 的最佳貼文
Short Film 「CHOICE」
Are we blessed to be born?
What is blessing?
realistic element?
Or the sense of blessing a blessing itself?
我々は祝福され生まれてきたのであろうか
現実的な要素が祝福か?
祝福と思える考えがそれそのものか?
There’s no fairness in this world.
Time, Race, Age, Circumstances...
Every factor can change the way it works.
平等というものはこの世にはない
等しく皆に訪れる事柄でも、時代、人種、年齢、環境…
様々な要因が、作用を変化させる
Relativistic words swirl around, and distort our concepts.
The words that seem to provide hope have prerequisites that are taken for granted.
They don't even care about those who fell off from the frame.
相対評価的な言葉が渦巻き、概念を歪めていく
一見前向きな希望を謳った言葉も当たり前かのような前提条件があり
その枠に漏れたものの存在など考えてもいない
Hope turned into justice,
and the meaning of empathy changed to consumers.
いつしか希望が正論に変わり
共感の意味は消費者に変わった
So, are we all alone
No one is the same, we never understand each other.
but no one can live alone.
では我々は孤独なのであろうか
同じ人間は1人としておらず、理解し合うことはできない
だが、人は1人では生きていけない
Definitions are made from standards, and standards are different for each one of us.
Therefore, it may seem relative, but it is absolute.
定義は基準によって為され、基準は人それぞれだ
よってそれは相対的に見えて絶対的なのだ
“Love” is always tough. Painful. Frightful.
It's up to us to choose whether we want to be loved.
辛く、苦しく、恐ろしい愛の方が多く
それを愛されるとするかは選択次第なのだ
Life is painful.
Life is beautiful.
生きることは、苦しく
生きることは、美しい
Director : Koshun Mamiya
Director of Photography : Kotaro Yamada
Assistant Camera : Masato Tanaka
Lighting Director : Sora Okubo
Original/Styling/Edit : Koshun Mamiya
Translation : Nao Asada
Narrator : Anocam
Music : 329
Acoustic guitar : Tomoki Iwasaki
Cast : emma
Koshun Mamiya
https://www.instagram.com/koshunn/
emma
https://www.instagram.com/emma_chijoke/
Kotaro Yamada
https://www.instagram.com/kotaroyamada_jp/
Masato Tanaka
https://www.instagram.com/holyhuman__1231/
Sora Okubo
https://www.instagram.com/sora075_/
329
https://www.instagram.com/bpm329/
Anocam
https://www.instagram.com/anocam_/
Nao Asada
https://twitter.com/yokutabenemuru
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/630ba/630bafc747d975127edb2c80c1f95250b022e13a" alt="post-title"
relative to 在 煮家男人 Bob's Your Uncle Youtube 的最佳貼文
上星期叫咗啲朋友上嚟睇英格蘭對蘇格蘭,老婆整咗個韓式炒粉絲; 同埋同大家分享吓上個月去劍橋郡探朋友親戚嘅片段。
Two things that I would like to show you in today's video: A vlog about us going to Cambridgeshire visiting friend and relative, and a video recipe of Japchae, a Korean glass noodle dish.
三人份量 For 3 people
紅蘿蔔兩條 - 2 carrots
洋蔥半個 - half an onion
蔥五條 - 5 stalks of spring onion
蘑菇六個 - 6 brown mushrooms
牛肉80克 - 80g of beef
蛋一隻 - 1 egg
菠菜235克 - a pack of 235g spinach
蒜頭兩個 - 2 cloves of garlic
韓式粉絲150克 - 150g of Korean glass noodles
豉油2茶匙 - 2tsp of soy sauce
羅漢果糖/砂糖一茶匙 - 2tsp of sugar
麻油2茶匙 - 2tsp of sesame oil
白芝麻適量 - pinch of white sesame
鹽適量 - salt
白胡椒粉適量 - ground white pepper
黑木耳30克
芷靈 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/backpacooking
芷靈 Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDufxgd5cAYCS61ed8lcA-Q
芷靈 Instagram: leungcatherine
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aafc2/aafc250e6cd6ac2565249e06060a7ecae449e28c" alt="post-title"
relative to 在 賓狗單字Bingo Bilingual Youtube 的精選貼文
賓狗誠心徵求廠商乾媽乾爹!!
歡迎來信:weeklybingoenglish@gmail.com
口播範例:https://open.firstory.me/story/cki3sellb6rrg0873cucxj9wo/platforms
也歡迎商談冠名贊助
1 溫度 temperature
Temperature is the measured amount of heat in a place or in the body.
2 氣溫 air temperature
Air temperature will continue to fall over the weekend.
3 體感溫度 real feel temperature
The real feel temperature can give people a sense as to what the temperature feels like.
4 相對濕度 relative humidity
The real feel temperature takes into account relative humidity and air temperature.
5「台北冬天又溼又冷」
The winter weather in Taipei is cold and damp.
(The damp cold in Taipei is the goddamn worst.)
你想在其他平台上追蹤賓狗嗎?
這裡請:https://bingolinks.carrd.co/
Instagram:https://www.instagram.com/bingobilingual_bb
YouTube 也有日更喔,歡迎來訂閱!
https://www.youtube.com/c/BingoBilingual
你比較想聽廢廢傻傻的賓狗嗎?
歡迎加入 Telegram 上的專屬社群,跟賓狗碎碎念、嘻嘻哈哈:
https://t.me/joinchat/Rq_MDn8QaS1IkvQR
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69aee/69aeecc2523b0dec6fdcfd5cfe0df5f75b680b7d" alt="post-title"
relative to 在 #include directive: relative to where? - Stack Overflow 的推薦與評價
... <看更多>
相關內容